Summary: | order by date of arrival doesn't | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] kmail | Reporter: | Unknown <null> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | kdepim bugs <kdepim-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 1.5 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | RedHat Enterprise Linux | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: |
Description
Michael Wardle
2003-02-19 04:13:55 UTC
Subject: Re: New: order by date of arrival doesn't Sorting by "Order of Arrival" sorts by the serial number that is given to the messages the first time KMail sees them. As the serial number are strictly increasing this means that the messages are sorted by their arrival in KMail. This won't be changed. It may happen that a message is given a new serial number under certain circumstances. This would explain the "strange" sorting of the one week old message you noticed. > Sorting by "Order of Arrival" sorts by the serial number that is given
> to the messages the first time KMail sees them.
No it doesn't! That's the bug!
Please reread my bug report or ask for more information if something
is unclear.
Subject: Re: New: order by date of arrival doesn't Sorting by "Order of Arrival" sorts by the serial number that is given to the messages the first time KMail sees them. As the serial number are strictly increasing this means that the messages are sorted by their arrival in KMail. This won't be changed. It may happen that a message is given a new serial number under certain circumstances. This would explain the "strange" sorting of the one week old message you noticed. Subject: Re: order by date of arrival doesn't Sorry for re-closing the bug report. I erroneously sent some messages a second time. Replaced michael.wardle@adacel.com with null@kde.org due to bounces by reporter works fine on kmail-1.7.1(kde-3.3.1 ) should this be closed? It's still not completely correct, but since we won't improve it further for the time being, I'll close it. |