| Summary: | Allow us to set the "specify time delay for slideshow" to 0.5 seconds. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | mlh.kiwi |
| Component: | Plugin-Generic-SlideShow | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
| Status: | RESOLVED NOT A BUG | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | CC: | caulier.gilles, metzpinguin |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version: | 8.3.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Microsoft Windows | ||
| OS: | Microsoft Windows | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | 8.5.0 | |
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
| Attachments: |
attachment-233074-0.html
attachment-462433-0.html attachment-3191248-0.html attachment-2566995-0.html attachment-2607892-0.html attachment-2614021-0.html |
||
Seriously, why do you need a 0.25 second delay in a slideshow? Wouldn't it be better to create a video slideshow with digiKam? Maik Created attachment 172061 [details] attachment-233074-0.html "create a video slideshow with digiKam" - I don't want to create just view, I sometimes use the slideshow to view my images but one second can be slow, I mean 0.5 would be double speed (I think 0.25 would be to fast). On Sun, 28 Jul 2024 at 18:34, Maik Qualmann <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490907 > > Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin@gmail.com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |metzpinguin@gmail.com > > --- Comment #1 from Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin@gmail.com> --- > Seriously, why do you need a 0.25 second delay in a slideshow? > Wouldn't it be better to create a video slideshow with digiKam? > > Maik > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. 0.25 or 0.5 seconds of Slideshow delay is a non sence for me... Hi, I agree with Maik, less than 1 second delay in Slideshow is a non sence. Uses the Video Slideshow tool from digiKam to generate the right number of frames by second. All is well settable in this tool. https://docs.digikam.org/en/post_processing/video_slideshow.html Q : did you want a delay largest that 3600 s in the Slideshow tool ? Best Gilles Caulier Created attachment 172098 [details] attachment-462433-0.html I don't want to make a video just view the images! On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 19:49, <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490907 > > --- Comment #4 from caulier.gilles@gmail.com --- > Hi, > > I agree with Maik, less than 1 second delay in Slideshow is a non sence. > > Uses the Video Slideshow tool from digiKam to generate the right number of > frames by second. All is well settable in this tool. > > https://docs.digikam.org/en/post_processing/video_slideshow.html > > Q : did you want a delay largest that 3600 s in the Slideshow tool ? > > Best > > Gilles Caulier > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. Created attachment 172917 [details] attachment-3191248-0.html Surely this would be an easy thing to change? On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 19:55, Matthew <mlh.kiwi@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't want to make a video just view the images! > > On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 19:49, <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote: > >> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490907 >> >> --- Comment #4 from caulier.gilles@gmail.com --- >> Hi, >> >> I agree with Maik, less than 1 second delay in Slideshow is a non sence. >> >> Uses the Video Slideshow tool from digiKam to generate the right number of >> frames by second. All is well settable in this tool. >> >> https://docs.digikam.org/en/post_processing/video_slideshow.html >> >> Q : did you want a delay largest that 3600 s in the Slideshow tool ? >> >> Best >> >> Gilles Caulier >> >> -- >> You are receiving this mail because: >> You reported the bug. > > Created attachment 175606 [details] attachment-2566995-0.html Surely? On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 at 12:29, Matthew <mlh.kiwi@gmail.com> wrote: > Surely this would be an easy thing to change? > > On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 19:55, Matthew <mlh.kiwi@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I don't want to make a video just view the images! >> >> On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 19:49, <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote: >> >>> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490907 >>> >>> --- Comment #4 from caulier.gilles@gmail.com --- >>> Hi, >>> >>> I agree with Maik, less than 1 second delay in Slideshow is a non sence. >>> >>> Uses the Video Slideshow tool from digiKam to generate the right number >>> of >>> frames by second. All is well settable in this tool. >>> >>> https://docs.digikam.org/en/post_processing/video_slideshow.html >>> >>> Q : did you want a delay largest that 3600 s in the Slideshow tool ? >>> >>> Best >>> >>> Gilles Caulier >>> >>> -- >>> You are receiving this mail because: >>> You reported the bug. >> >> Sorry, 0.5 seconds is not enough to load some modern image formats, even with a second and fast computers there has to be a delay. And pre-loading doesn't help if there isn't enough time. You would have to pre-load all images in the size of the screen and uncompressed as a temporary storage and then always load them quickly. Simply setting the time parameter and reducing the minimum is not enough here. Maik Created attachment 175608 [details] attachment-2607892-0.html Thankyou for that answer, I understand! On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 at 20:09, Maik Qualmann <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490907 > > --- Comment #8 from Maik Qualmann <metzpinguin@gmail.com> --- > Sorry, 0.5 seconds is not enough to load some modern image formats, even > with a > second and fast computers there has to be a delay. And pre-loading doesn't > help > if there isn't enough time. > You would have to pre-load all images in the size of the screen and > uncompressed as a temporary storage and then always load them quickly. > > Simply setting the time parameter and reducing the minimum is not enough > here. > > Maik > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. Maik, I think this file can be closed as NOT A BUG... Right? Gilles Created attachment 175609 [details] attachment-2614021-0.html Yes, you are right. On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 at 21:14, <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490907 > > --- Comment #10 from caulier.gilles@gmail.com --- > Maik, > > I think this file can be closed as NOT A BUG... Right? > > Gilles > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. |
You can set the slideshow delay ("specify time delay for slideshow") between images all the way up to 3600 seconds, so one whole hour, yet I could not set this time delay to a half second (0.5) or a quarter second (0.25).