| Summary: | Wrong schema and description of Rating into the XMP Viewer configuration panel | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | mahikeulbody <51mfxqck> |
| Component: | Metadata-Xmp | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
| Status: | RESOLVED UPSTREAM | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | caulier.gilles, metzpinguin |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 8.2.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Manjaro | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | 8.3.0 | |
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
mahikeulbody
2024-02-12 09:14:37 UTC
According to Adobe it belongs to Basic Name Scheme: https://developer.adobe.com/xmp/docs/XMPNamespaces/xmp/ Furthermore, this description comes from Exiv2 and, if it were an error, would have to be reported there. Maik Report as UPSTREAM bug to Exiv2 project (:-))): https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/issues (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #1) > According to Adobe it belongs to Basic Name Scheme: Well, Adobe doc says "The preferred namespace prefix is xmp", which is part of IPTC Extension schema which exists into the XMP Viewer configuration panel of digikam so... > Furthermore, this description comes from Exiv2 and, if it were an error, would have to be reported there. I am more focused (and confident) on Exiftool and it is a cosmetic "problem" : once you know that xmp-rating is (wrongly) located into Basic Name Scheme instead of IPTC Extension schema, you are done. So I don't care to submit a bug to exiv2. |