| Summary: | Sort photos by shooting date | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | delphibit |
| Component: | Albums-ItemsSort | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
| Status: | RESOLVED NOT A BUG | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | CC: | delphibit, metzpinguin |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 7.6.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Manjaro | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | 7.7.0 | |
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
delphibit
2022-06-04 12:59:44 UTC
And what should the shooting date be from the metadata? The digiKam "Creation" date is the OriginalDateTime from the metadata of the images. Only in the case that no metadata is available, it is obtained from the file date. Maik (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #1) > And what should the shooting date be from the metadata? The digiKam > "Creation" date is the OriginalDateTime from the metadata of the images. > Only in the case that no metadata is available, it is obtained from the file > date. > > Maik Sorry, I misread the creation date in Digikam. The camera's date had been incorrectly configured. The difference lied in the year field (In reply to delphibit from comment #2) > (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #1) > > And what should the shooting date be from the metadata? The digiKam > > "Creation" date is the OriginalDateTime from the metadata of the images. > > Only in the case that no metadata is available, it is obtained from the file > > date. > > > > Maik > > Sorry, I misread the creation date in Digikam. The camera's date had been > incorrectly configured. The difference lied in the year field The difference was in the year field* Thank you in any case |