| Summary: | Window rules grouping/sorting | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] systemsettings | Reporter: | Dominik Kummer <admin> |
| Component: | kcm_kwinrules | Assignee: | Dominik Kummer <admin> |
| Status: | ASSIGNED --- | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | CC: | isma.af, nate, plasma-bugs-null |
| Priority: | NOR | Keywords: | usability |
| Version First Reported In: | 5.22.5 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Arch Linux | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Dominik Kummer
2021-09-09 10:37:11 UTC
Yes, grouping would be a bit difficult/confusing, as the execution order is important in this case. Filtering by keyword though seems a sound addition for users who manage lots of rules. When filtering, reordering the rules should be probably disabled to avoid conflicts. A tree model could help to group the rules without confusion/conflict because a tree can be processed orderly. As the rules are unique by name, a filtered list (or tree) could be reordered without conflict. In a list of [A, B, C] which is then filtered to [A, C] then [A] can still be moved behind [C] to result in [C, A]. After unfiltering the list looks like [B, C, A]. But within a tree structure [A] could probably move into another "directory/group". On the other hand the tree structure could still be visible during applied filtering, so a move operation across directories is always transparent and comprehensible. |