Summary: | create a tool to automatically group jpeg and raw images with same name | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | Karsten de Freese <karsten.defreese> |
Component: | Albums-ItemGroup | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | ||
Severity: | wishlist | CC: | caulier.gilles, freisim93, laurakittyinka, metzpinguin |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 5.4.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | openSUSE | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | 5.5.0 | |
Attachments: |
rename type -> filename
Updated doc with "Group By Filename" |
Description
Karsten de Freese
2017-02-11 13:31:30 UTC
Created attachment 103980 [details]
rename type -> filename
This is already possible: Select all items you want to group, in the context menu select group -> group selected by type. This is however wrongly named, as the resulting groups do not contain files with the same type but files with the same filename excluding extension. This discussion has already happened, but I can't find a bug report - I assume it was on the user mailing list.
The attached patch renames the UI string and the involved methods: type -> filename. Gilles, Maik or Mario (or anyone else) do you agree?
Yes, I agree. File name is more logical. Maik Fine for me too... Gilles I committed this but borked up the CCBUG part, so here is the link to the commit: https://cgit.kde.org/digikam.git/commit/?id=4a2ef6c03aeebf37f7515a6d6c37d971d609443 thanks for the quick help! 'context menu select group -> group selected by type' did exactly what I was looking for. This function did not catch my attention before, probably because I was assuming that it would do the same thing as 'view -> group pictures -> by format', instead of the slightly different wording. With the changed UI string this will certainly be more obvious..! Created attachment 104004 [details]
Updated doc with "Group By Filename"
I updated the doc accordingly (see patch attached).
Whoever would like to commit it on my behalf (Gilles, Maik, Simon): feel free!
Updated screenshot follows once the changes are in the AppImage.
Simon, just for me to learn: why did you set "WORKSFORME" and not "FIXED"? Wolfgang Am 12.02.2017 um 12:11 schrieb Simon: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376351 > > Simon <freisim93@gmail.com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME > Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED > Hi Wolfgang, Better don't learn from me in this regard - I am still learning myself. I can still give you my reasoning of course: This issue was asking about functionality that was already there. My commit that renamed this functionality did not fix the issue, while it was obviously related to this issue. So I was wondering whether I should file it as "invalid" or "worksforme". I decided for the latter, as the requested functionality is sound (i.e. not invalid), we just have it already (it works for me). In the end I figured the most important part is to close the issue, the reason is kind of secondary. Cheers, Simon Git commit 875ac9bef9d0745b3f67e52de115b7008f580c11 by Gilles Caulier. Committed on 13/02/2017 at 18:03. Pushed by cgilles into branch 'master'. apply patch #104004 to implement Group by filename in digiKam handbook M +2 -2 digikam/using-mainwindow-imageview.docbook https://commits.kde.org/digikam-doc/875ac9bef9d0745b3f67e52de115b7008f580c11 |