Bug 366492

Summary:	OFX Import dialog does not import OFX files
Product:	[Applications] kmymoney	Reporter:	JantarMantar <paresh_adhia>
Component:	general	Assignee:	KMyMoney Devel Mailing List <kmymoney-devel>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	major	CC:	alexandref75, ralf.habacker, tamort
Priority:	NOR
Version:	git (master)
Target Milestone:	---
Platform:	Other
OS:	Linux
Latest Commit:		Version Fixed In:
Attachments:	Patch to kmymoney.cpp to allow importing of OFX files

Description JantarMantar 2016-08-07 12:00:28 UTC

Recently (as of github.com commit: 5e883c11a3ef5001c67ceb680701dbc4bb97ce95), OFX Import dialog does nothing. The dialog comes up, (even looks strange because it doesn't limit file types to OFX types) , allows to pick a file and then closes with no action.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. From File->Import menu select "OFX..."
2. Notice that the dialog' Filter field is unusual that it doesn't filer only OFX types and Name: field says 'kde-import'
3. Select an OFX file to import


Actual Results:  
1. Dialog closes with no action nor any error message
2. There are no messages on terminal either.

Expected Results:  
Selected OFX file should be processed or an error displayed if it's an invalid file.


This is a regression from github.com commit: 4604c7eca3bc50902a60fdbfe95ee47482f487c8
At this commit, the OFX Import was successfully working

Comment 1 tamort 2017-04-22 22:10:29 UTC

This exact behavior is seen in b1468e678e5fc0a4092c11b63c3e5255f4659a8c

Comment 2 Alexandre 2017-08-04 21:58:30 UTC

Created attachment 107078 [details]
Patch to kmymoney.cpp to allow importing of OFX files

Comment 3 Alexandre 2017-08-04 22:01:06 UTC

KF5 seems to have changed the API to select files and the capability of importing OFX is commented on the code. This patch allows a single file to the imported, f more than one is selected only the first one is imported. It also corrects some seg faults that occur when I import some OFX files.

Comment 4 Thomas Baumgart 2017-08-05 07:14:22 UTC

Alexandre, thanks for the proposed patch. I'll take care of it. I just wonder what the following change is needed for:

-  QString accId;
+  QString accId = QString();

The additional assignment does not make any sense in my eyes. Maybe, you can share the reasons.

Comment 5 Alexandre 2017-08-05 14:47:17 UTC

Thomas, thanks for the correction, that statement is redundant. I was debugging some seg fault and changed this function a few times and forced that initialization to check and forgot to remove it.

Comment 6 Thomas Baumgart 2018-01-09 11:47:45 UTC

This must have been fixed in the meantime. I cannot duplicate it with current 5.0 branch.