| Summary: | kscreen kcm: orientation should be under advanced | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Plasma] KScreen | Reporter: | andreas <kainz.a> |
| Component: | kcm | Assignee: | Sebastian Kügler <sebas> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INTENTIONAL | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | CC: | mgraesslin, nate, tietze.heiko |
| Priority: | NOR | Flags: | kainz.a:
Usability+
|
| Version First Reported In: | 5.7.1 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Other | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
andreas
2016-07-16 18:41:17 UTC
There are data from a survey that support this request: http://user-prompt.com/kscreen-results-of-the-user-survey/ Makes sense, yes. I have quite a few issues with the UI as it currently is myself, but I want to concentrate on the underlying mechanisms first, and once that works (and we have better testing methods, wayland helps a great lot here), we can start improving the UI. I disagree. Rotation becomes more important with convertable notebooks. For them it's important to rotate the screen as soon as they go into tablet mode. Ideally that's handled automatically. But that's not the point: orientation is no longer the weird thing nobody uses but a rather important core functionality. in a tablet mode I would prefer a plasmoid that rotate the ui instead of a kcm where I can do that. For tablets, the solution is auto-rotation, which is working or will eventually work on Wayland. I agree that this is now basic functionality for the KCM. The KCM itself is a fairly nerdy thing that regular users won't generally have a reason to go to, so IMO it's okay for it to display stuff like this in it. |