Summary: | Systemmonitor detailed view is almost unreadable with Breeze Dark color theme | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Unmaintained] ksysguard | Reporter: | supaiku <supaiku> |
Component: | ksysguard | Assignee: | KSysGuard Developers <ksysguard-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | anselmolsm, aspotashev, bruno, bugseforuns, hrvoje.senjan, kde, razrfalcon, sebas |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 5.2.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Arch Linux | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: | |||
Attachments: | Screenshot |
Description
supaiku
2015-01-28 07:46:08 UTC
Could you attach a screenshot illustrating the problem? That would make it way easier to triage and fix. Created attachment 90746 [details]
Screenshot
Thanks, for the additional information. I've attached the correct meta information to the bug so it's easier to track for us. The problem is that the HTML generated for the report doesn't set the right background color. We could make use of Plasma::Theme::styleSheet() for this. >We could make use of Plasma::Theme::styleSheet() for this.
No we can't, we're in an application. We can't mix and match style info.
Well, in this case we can because there won't be any clashes because it's a separate view. Probably easier though is to just set the background of the HTML code that gets inserted there. I also use Breeze Dark and this week I had to use the system monitor detailed view many times. I decided to check what could be done to make that view more readable. As a workaround, I modified scripts/smaps/style.css, adding an entry to set the html body background color to #FCFCFC (the bg color when using Breeze), so the background color doesn't depend on the color scheme in use. styles.css has many fixed color definitions (texts, links, TOC bg), so IMPOV setting a color for the body bg guarantees that all those colors work well together. Of course, to make this view adaptable to other color schemes, more changes are required, indeed. *** Bug 361673 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 360214 *** |