Bug 323935

Summary: While declaring support of NIKON D800/D800E, camera import tool does NOT provide support
Product: [Applications] digikam Reporter: Axel Krebs <axel.krebs>
Component: Import-Gphoto2Assignee: Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null>
Status: RESOLVED UPSTREAM    
Severity: normal CC: caulier.gilles
Priority: NOR    
Version: 3.3.0   
Target Milestone: ---   
Platform: Ubuntu   
OS: Linux   
Latest Commit: Version Fixed In: 7.6.0
Attachments: missing D800 / D800E support
missing D800 / D800E support?

Description Axel Krebs 2013-08-23 17:20:02 UTC
Small inconsistancy:

In new capabilities, the programn announces supporting the new NIKON D800 and D800E (pic I).
While declaring this, the camera import tool does NOT contain an according camera type to select (pic II)


Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. open digiKAM 3.3
2. watch greeting screen announcing support
3. when selecting the import tool, you'll see missing D800 / D800E
Actual Results:  
compare steps to reproduce- "3"

Expected Results:  
what is announced, shozuld be contained in the programs capabilities- camera import tools, respective 

This issue is -not- new, as I spelled this out already before. 

I read, this issue was resolved- where, when, how?
Comment 1 Axel Krebs 2013-08-23 17:22:34 UTC
Created attachment 81879 [details]
missing D800 / D800E support
Comment 2 Axel Krebs 2013-08-23 17:26:12 UTC
Created attachment 81880 [details]
missing D800 / D800E support?
Comment 3 caulier.gilles 2013-08-23 17:27:08 UTC
Camera support listed in from digiKam page is about RAW demosaicing (see http://www.libraw.org/), not import which is delegate to Gphoto (http://www.gphoto.org/)

So, try to update libgphoto2 on your computer. If it doesn't work report this problem to Gphoto project.

Gilles Caulier
Comment 4 caulier.gilles 2013-08-23 17:30:46 UTC
Camera support listed in from digiKam page is about RAW demosaicing (see http://www.libraw.org/), not import which is delegate to Gphoto (http://www.gphoto.org/)

So, try to update libgphoto2 on your computer. If it doesn't work report this problem to Gphoto project.

Gilles Caulier
Comment 5 Axel Krebs 2013-08-23 18:17:40 UTC
Gilles:

You are certainly right- opensource components used in digiKam provide
many interesting features & capabilities.

I guess, my report bases more or less on a formal thing based on non
seamless integration. If digiKam declares a certain ability to be
available, this should be the case! ("maybe an issue related to quality
control"?)

What I'm missing, is seamless integration without edges and knodes- as a
user, I do _not_ ask for where certain capabilities came from.

I just read and find differences. And, I guess there some of these weak
points more.

Still, digiKam is a strong piece of software without many competitors.

My intention is to continue smoothening workflows, if possible!


Axel
---
Am 23.08.2013 19:30, schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323935
> 
> Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles@gmail.com> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |caulier.gilles@gmail.com
>              Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
>          Resolution|---                         |UPSTREAM
> 
> --- Comment #3 from Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles@gmail.com> ---
> Camera support listed in from digiKam page is about RAW demosaicing (see
> http://www.libraw.org/), not import which is delegate to Gphoto
> (http://www.gphoto.org/)
> 
> So, try to update libgphoto2 on your computer. If it doesn't work report this
> problem to Gphoto project.
> 
> Gilles Caulier
> 
> --- Comment #4 from Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles@gmail.com> ---
> Camera support listed in from digiKam page is about RAW demosaicing (see
> http://www.libraw.org/), not import which is delegate to Gphoto
> (http://www.gphoto.org/)
> 
> So, try to update libgphoto2 on your computer. If it doesn't work report this
> problem to Gphoto project.
> 
> Gilles Caulier
>