Summary: | add sorting options per cd | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] amarok | Reporter: | NSLW <lukasz.wojnilowicz> |
Component: | Collection Browser | Assignee: | Amarok Developers <amarok-bugs-dist> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | wishlist | ||
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 2.6.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | 2.7 | ||
Platform: | Fedora RPMs | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Attachments: | Third sorting level in Amarok 2.7 |
Description
NSLW
2013-01-07 17:19:44 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 207358 *** (In reply to comment #1) > > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 207358 *** Are you sure it's duplicate? I don't want to have multiple collections with different sorting, but when I think about that, it would be great too. I only would like to have the same selection in third sorting level as in first and second level (namely "CD number"). I believe it takes much less time to implement this, than in bug 207358. Now in Amarok 2.7 I see that "CD Number" has been removed, so this bug would be only for bringing "CD Number" back to sorting levels. It is a duplicate, as adding more id3 tag options would need to be implemented for both, adding more complexity to the code BTW. Where do you see that removed? Maybe we don't talk about the same thing here... a screenshot might be helpful Created attachment 79714 [details]
Third sorting level in Amarok 2.7
Here is what I am talking about. Were we talking about the same thing?
I made mistake in screenshot because I should point first or second level. I am pretty sure there never was a sorting option by CD number there, and I just went through the chances in the code in that part since 2.6 and nothing indicates that anything was removed there. (In reply to comment #7) > I am pretty sure there never was a sorting option by CD number there, and I > just went through the chances in the code in that part since 2.6 and nothing > indicates that anything was removed there. Ok. That's not important. Maybe I had illusions :) but anyway thanks for checking. Now that we know what it's about, I would like to know if it is still so much work (as you've mentioned earlier) to be done to add "CD number" to these sorting levels? P.S. Is it still duplicate then? Yes, and yes :) |