Bug 302620

Summary: missing thumbnails in right hand window
Product: [Applications] digikam Reporter: rmcknight <rmcknight>
Component: Thumbs-ImageAssignee: Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null>
Status: RESOLVED INTENTIONAL    
Severity: normal CC: caulier.gilles
Priority: NOR    
Version First Reported In: 2.6.0   
Target Milestone: ---   
Platform: unspecified   
OS: Linux   
Latest Commit: Version Fixed/Implemented In: 8.2.0
Sentry Crash Report:
Attachments: shows where the counts differ
setting found here:

Description rmcknight 2012-06-27 09:36:29 UTC 
this also existed on 2.5

digikam knows there are more images as the (count)  even says there are more in the folder.

i have searched and searched to no prevail.
if i open the folder in a file manager it shows all the pics correctly. but not in the right hand side.
this is not a crash - and possibly not even a bug, as its the sort of thing that may have a setting for it somewhere.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open a sub-folder 
2. note the number of images presented
3. run a slideshow with the option "with all sub-folders" and more images are shown (even though there are NO sub-folders).  OR  just note the folder count of the images in (brackets) differs to the count on the top of the window.
Actual Results:  
not all images are shown in right hand window

Expected Results:  
all images in the folder should be shown (just like if you open the folder in dolphin).

i know you are thinking im clicking on a higher level folder, but im not.  Its a filder i just created and uploaded all my images into.   But i have noted that this has occured in several other places as well.
Comment 1 rmcknight 2012-06-28 07:54:21 UTC 
Created attachment 72188 [details]
shows where the counts differ
Comment 2 rmcknight 2012-07-08 07:12:19 UTC 
Created attachment 72362 [details]
setting found here:

Mystery solved, i found the settings in the "editing images" setup.
Very poor placement, they should be in the "album view" as they effect whats shown in the "album view".   I wonder if you should put it in both?
Comment 3 rmcknight 2012-07-08 07:13:26 UTC 
i marked it as fixed, but its not ideal.