Summary: | Rename the "close" option | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] kst | Reporter: | Grégoire Verlut <gregoire.verlut> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | kst |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | wishlist | CC: | netterfield, nicolas.brisset |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 2.0.5 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Microsoft Windows | ||
OS: | Microsoft Windows | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Grégoire Verlut
2012-06-21 09:26:54 UTC
This option both closes the current session and creates a new one. So neither name is fully 'self explanatory'. And neither name is wrong. How about 'Close/New' ? I'm all for "New Session". As long as Kst asks whether the user wants to save his changes before throwing everything away, there is no risk IMHO. I think Close/New is clumsy and Close alone is not clear: which file(s) will it close (datasources, .kst, ...) and what will happen to Kst? I would almost commit it right now... so that we can close the bug and get it into 2.0.6. Good for our statistics :-) But I'll wait for some feedback. By the way, when using this action I often get a Kst crash not too long after. I fear we don't really reset everything properly. But that should go into a different bug report. SVN commit 1304398 by brisset: Rename the "Close" File menu entry to "New Session", which is less confusing. I checked that when there are unsaved changes the user gets a chance to save them :-) M +2 -2 mainwindow.cpp WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=1304398 |