Summary: | Versioning cuts image filenames after the first '.' | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | barsanuphe <mon.adresse.publique> |
Component: | Albums-Versioning | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | caulier.gilles |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 2.0.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Arch Linux | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | 2.0.0 | |
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
barsanuphe
2011-06-25 10:34:27 UTC
Which versionning file naming logic is used in other photo-management program ? Gilles Caulier I'm not sure since I only use Digikam. I'd settle for any that doesn't eat part of the filename :). A simple _v1.jpg, _v2.jpg suffix would be fine in my book. The precise observation is that for each newly generated filename, the part to the next '.' is cut Git commit 481858207256d7eecc9d5a4ff93ad77ad2984844 by Marcel Wiesweg. Committed on 14/07/2011 at 19:42. Pushed by mwiesweg into branch 'master'. When we have the basename and not a full filename, we should not replace the suffix, but add the suffix. BUG: 276450 M +2 -1 NEWS M +25 -1 libs/versionmanager/versionmanager.cpp http://commits.kde.org/digikam/481858207256d7eecc9d5a4ff93ad77ad2984844 |