Bug 274302

Summary: search for _two_ keywords with logical "and" fails
Product: [Applications] digikam Reporter: Axel Krebs <axel.krebs>
Component: Searches-AdvancedAssignee: Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: normal CC: caulier.gilles
Priority: NOR    
Version: 2.0.0   
Target Milestone: ---   
Platform: Ubuntu   
OS: Linux   
Latest Commit: Version Fixed In: 2.0.0
Sentry Crash Report:

Description Axel Krebs 2011-05-27 20:45:37 UTC 
Version:           2.0.0 (using KDE 4.6.2) 
OS:                Linux

digiKam version 2.0.0-beta5


I try to consolidate my collections, using Statistics as follows:
AVI: 59
GIF: 99
JP2: 14
JPG: 63696
MPEG: 2
PGF: 2
PNG: 875
RAW-CR2: 631
RAW-CRW: 10960
RAW-DNG: 4
RAW-NEF: 31801
TIFF: 880
Gesamtzahl der Einträge: 109023
Alben: 1742
Stichwörter: 46: 
Datenbanktreiber: QSQLITE

Searching two keywords (in "extended search"), 
one keyword in the first "search group", 
the second in the second "search grop", 

I do get result from...
- search group first
- search group second
and hits including _both_ keywords. 

But: I choose logical "and", which is not realized correctly. 

Maybe this extended search is a great tool; for my opinion it is somehow "tricky", complicated, and fancy. It does not easiliy fulfill my (users) demands, maybe.


Axel 

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
just search for two keywords, logically connected with "and". Cannot search for this demands.


Expected Results:  
Easily to handle. Straight-on handling. It seems _not_ to be _self_-_explaning_

OS: Linux (i686) release 2.6.35-28-generic-pae
Compiler: cc
Comment 1 Marcel Wiesweg 2011-06-11 16:52:44 UTC 
You do it like this dont you:
http://wstaw.org/m/2011/06/11/plasma-desktoppu2238.jpg

Works quite fine for me. Pictures with me in Paris, no picture where I am not depicted, no picture not taken in Paris.
Comment 2 Axel Krebs 2011-06-11 20:57:21 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> You do it like this dont you:
> http://wstaw.org/m/2011/06/11/plasma-desktoppu2238.jpg
> 
> Works quite fine for me. Pictures with me in Paris, no picture where I am not
> depicted, no picture not taken in Paris.

I found by fortune, that "ODER" can be switched into "UND" bei simple clicking. Why should one assume, that this switch is active?

Maybe there is another way showing intuively the handling correctly?

Thanks for your help. Error is "resolved"


Axel