Summary: | HUB : assign rating fails when tags have been changed too | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | kde |
Component: | Metadata-Hub | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
Status: | REPORTED --- | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | caulier.gilles, smvdheijden |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 4.0.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Compiled Sources | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
kde
2010-12-08 17:46:48 UTC
Marcel, Do you see this entry ? // --------------------------------------------------------------- To Reporter, Can you test with 1.8.0, or 1.9.0 (current implementation) I cannot reproduce the problem with 2.0.0. Can you confirm ? Gilles Caulier I have no 1.8.0 or 1.9.0 installed, but in 2.0.0-beta3 the problem still exists according to my tests. This problem still persists in version 2.5 To reproduce: - Modify settings to embed metadata in image files - open a image with normal albumview - Press Ctrl-3 to assign rating 3 (you see the rating changed to ***) - assign a tag by clicking with the mouse in the tags-Tab. (or assign a pick label/color label) - DON'T press the Apply-Button, it needs to be active (not greyed out) - Press Ctrl-1 What happens: rating gets changed to 1 star (*) (you sometimes can see that). then the tag info gets applied automatically and rating returns to 3 star (***), since thats what is still under the description-Tab Expected Results: rating should change to one star I can reproduce the problem with one additional step after "Press Ctrl-1": - select another picture (triggering to apply changes from the right side tab) Problem: ImageDescEditTab::slotReloadForMetadataChange() bails out if there have been user edits. Solution: change tracking, which adds another level of complexity to metadata hub Marcel, We have fixed something following your comment #4 with 3.x serie ? Gilles Caulier I doubt anything has been changed. It's a not trivial amount of work for a detail. *** Bug 330924 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Rolf, This file still valid using last digiKam 5.0.0 ? Gilles Caulier Any feedback with current AppImage bundle for Linux ? https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzeiVr-byqt5Y0tIRWVWelRJenM Gilles Caulier digiKam 7.0.0 stable release is now published: https://www.digikam.org/news/2020-07-19-7.0.0_release_announcement/ We need a fresh feedback on this file using this version. Best Regards Gilles Caulier @kde@schreiber-rolf.de digiKam 8.0.0 is out. This entry still valid with this release ? Best regards Gilles Caulier @kde@schreiber-rolf.de, What's about this file using current 8.2.0 AppImage Linux bundle ? It's reproducible ? https://files.kde.org/digikam/ Note: bundle is now based on Qt 5.15.11 and KDE framework 5.110. Thanks in advance Gilles Caulier I can confirm, that the bug still exists in version 7.5.0. I will test on 8.2 once I've installed that one. |