| Summary: | BQM Watermark tool : signature does not respect correct orientation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | Axel Krebs <axel.krebs> |
| Component: | Plugin-Bqm-WaterMark | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | ahmed.fathi.abdelmageed, caulier.gilles, rs4000, scl+kde |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version: | 1.2.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Ubuntu | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | https://commits.kde.org/digikam/d54da04770450fa56a712d05485b73f023b008c2 | Version Fixed In: | 5.5.0 |
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
| Attachments: |
signature at wrong posistion + wrong orientation
"orientation" - mixture between "position" and "orientation"? |
||
|
Description
Axel Krebs
2010-09-09 11:20:15 UTC
Created attachment 51457 [details]
signature at wrong posistion + wrong orientation
Axel, i can reproduce the problem, but it versy simple to solve it. As you can chain Batch tools in queue manager, just apply rotate tool previously using Exif orientation flag, and all will be fine. Gilles Caulier Gilles:
I am happy that you care for this question.
I can not really agree to you, however; in ergonomics, there is a _basic_ rule to be followed for users expectation reasons:
>> I get, what I want<<
Rem.: in German "Erwartungstreue" (sorry, don`t find english translation)
In concrete: if I want a signature somewhere (whereever!!!), I expect it to get _there_. No tricks, no additional tricks. Just this!
Gilles, I second this bug, it is pretty annoying indeed ;) Also, it does not remember the settings (don't know if it is a general bug though), as of 1.4.0. Created attachment 59159 [details]
"orientation" - mixture between "position" and "orientation"?
In "batch manager", "add watermark", we can easily choose a "position".
In mathematics, they distinguish between "position" (left up) and "orientation" "landscape" _or_ "upright", this is 4 x 4 = 16 possibilities!
Maybe a simple solution could be to pre-assume the oriention in "album view"(?) or "thumbnail view"(?) as a reference for watermarks (position _and- orientation).
please compare to bug290416, meaning appearently a similar bug!! *** Bug 290416 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** bug290416 is similar. I tried to rotate images first and then apply the watermark - which didnt lead to the expected result. I think this patch solves this problem : https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338869 Git commit d54da04770450fa56a712d05485b73f023b008c2 by Gilles Caulier. Committed on 09/02/2017 at 21:24. Pushed by cgilles into branch 'master'. apply patch #103909 to add rotation feature in BQM watermark tool with exif orientation support. Related: bug 338869, bug 290944 FIXED-IN: 5.5.0 M +6 -1 NEWS M +50 -0 libs/dimg/dimg.cpp M +6 -1 libs/dimg/dimg.h M +6 -0 libs/threadimageio/loadsavethread.cpp M +5 -0 libs/threadimageio/loadsavethread.h M +83 -12 utilities/queuemanager/tools/decorate/watermark.cpp M +1 -1 utilities/queuemanager/tools/decorate/watermark.h https://commits.kde.org/digikam/d54da04770450fa56a712d05485b73f023b008c2 |