| Summary: | when using multiple screens (nvidia twinview) the panel won't span the screens and it isn't possible to get a unifieid desktop | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Unmaintained] plasma4 | Reporter: | davidblunkett <dav1dblunk3tt> |
| Component: | containment-panel | Assignee: | Plasma Bugs List <plasma-bugs-null> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | finex |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Ubuntu | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
| Attachments: | layout example | ||
|
Description
davidblunkett
2010-08-14 10:34:53 UTC
Created attachment 50535 [details]
layout example
2 top panels to change activities (auto hide)
1 middle panel to start apps (windows can overlap panel)
bottom left (auto hide)
bottom right (auto hide, open windows panel)
Nothing to complain!
Precisely my point - I don't want numerous panels, I want one panel that spans the two screens and I want one desktop that spans the two screens so my desk top icons can make use of the area. And I still want the windows to be aware of the join in the middle. This worked perfectly in kde 3 I'm not a plasma developer, but I think this is a "WONTFIX" _by design_ Anyway, from my point of view, there are more benefits with the current implementation. I use two monitors too and my life is better with it :-) I can list some advantages. For example you can have two separated taskbar on the two monitors (very useful if you work with a lot of windows), it is more easy to place the panels when you use different screen resolutions and, generally speking, it is more tidy :-) Probably you could configure differently the X server in order to expose only one screen across the two monitors. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 167825 *** |