Bug 245993

Summary: Wish for field 'name day' in KAddressbook
Product: [Applications] kaddressbook Reporter: Piotr Suwara <peter_de_sowaro>
Component: generalAssignee: kdepim bugs <kdepim-bugs>
Status: REPORTED ---    
Severity: wishlist CC: dev, m_gr_01, opensource, tokoe
Priority: NOR    
Version: unspecified   
Target Milestone: ---   
Platform: Fedora RPMs   
OS: Linux   
Latest Commit: Version Fixed In:
Attachments: Name days patch (kdepimlib)
Name days patch (kdepim)

Description Piotr Suwara 2010-07-28 10:11:12 UTC
Version:           unspecified (using KDE 4.4.5) 
OS:                Linux

I wonder if there was a possibility of adding a field to address book named "Name day" similar to "Birthday", so that one may see it also in KOrganizer for example. Name day, according to Wikipedia, is celebrated in quite a lot of countries.

It would also be great to include name day calendars specific to different countries, so that one may just write down somebody's name and then choose the appropriate day (for most of the names there are several different name days, but of course one person celebrates only one of them).

Reproducible: Didn't try
Comment 1 wuertz 2010-12-30 15:50:29 UTC
Created attachment 55381 [details]
Name days patch (kdepimlib)

I have written a patch for this wish.
Comment 2 wuertz 2010-12-30 15:51:48 UTC
Created attachment 55382 [details]
Name days patch (kdepim)

This is the second part of the patch.
Comment 3 wuertz 2010-12-30 16:00:38 UTC
Patch note: If there are more then one name day the patch show all name days.
Comment 4 Michael Skiba 2013-03-18 18:35:40 UTC
What's the status of this wish/patch? Did you post this patch on the KDE reviewboard?
Comment 5 Justin Zobel 2021-03-09 02:34:13 UTC
Thank you for the bug report.

As this report hasn't seen any changes in 5 years or more, we ask if you can please confirm that the issue still persists.

If this bug is no longer persisting or relevant please change the status to resolved.
Comment 6 Kishore Gopalakrishnan 2024-03-17 10:05:10 UTC
*** Bug 183527 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***