Bug 221114

Summary:	white stripes shown for some thumbnails in the album view
Product:	[Applications] digikam	Reporter:	S. Burmeister <sven.burmeister>
Component:	Thumbs-Image	Assignee:	Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal	CC:	caulier.gilles, marcel.wiesweg
Priority:	NOR
Version:	1.1.0
Target Milestone:	---
Platform:	openSUSE
OS:	Linux
Latest Commit:		Version Fixed In:	5.1.0
Sentry Crash Report:
Attachments:	screenshot showing white stripes

Description S. Burmeister 2010-01-03 15:13:01 UTC

Version:           svn Rev: 1069274 (using KDE 4.3.4)
OS:                Linux
Installed from:    openSUSE RPMs

As you can see in the screenshot some thumbnails have a white stripe on one side while others don't. It's nothing major but does not look nice.

The theme is "Dark".

Comment 1 S. Burmeister 2010-01-03 15:13:37 UTC

Created attachment 39516 [details]
screenshot showing white stripes

Comment 2 caulier.gilles 2010-01-03 15:23:03 UTC

Which digiKam version you use ?

Gilles Caulier

Comment 3 S. Burmeister 2010-01-03 15:28:40 UTC

It's svn Rev: 1069274

Comment 4 Marcel Wiesweg 2010-01-03 16:31:29 UTC

Is it reproducible for each picture, that is, if you touch a picture and the thumbnail is regenerated, it's there again?

Comment 5 S. Burmeister 2010-01-03 20:41:44 UTC

If I touch a picture and press F5 the white stripe is gone. If I press F5 again it re-appears. Touching it makes it go away again until I reload with F5.

Comment 6 Marcel Wiesweg 2010-01-09 22:24:59 UTC

If you switch forth and back between different albums, do the stripes stay?
If you restart digikam, are the stripes back again? In each case, are exactly the same pictures affected?

In your screenshot, there are some images in wrong rotation, with the stripe at the top. Is this always like this, the stripe at the (corrected) left side? Are these pictures rotated because of a (wrong) exif rotation tag, or are they awaiting manual rotation and have no flag set?

Comment 7 Marcel Wiesweg 2011-02-10 22:24:05 UTC

Any such problem still reproducable with 2.0?

Comment 8 caulier.gilles 2015-07-02 05:04:51 UTC

New digiKam 4.11.0 is available.

https://www.digikam.org/node/740

Can you reproduce the problem with this release ?

Gilles Caulier

Comment 9 caulier.gilles 2016-07-15 21:03:50 UTC

With digiKam 5.0.0, this problem is not reproducible.
I close this file now. Don't hesitate to re-open if necessary.
Gilles Caulier