| Summary: | systray: customized auto-order of the systray icons | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Unmaintained] plasma4 | Reporter: | Maciej Pilichowski <bluedzins> |
| Component: | containment-panel | Assignee: | Plasma Bugs List <plasma-bugs-null> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | CC: | finex |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | openSUSE | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Maciej Pilichowski
2009-05-23 09:52:06 UTC
Checking the own reported bugs must be out of fashion these days... *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 170476 *** a) reading too b) dup-detection does not work after upgrade This report is about auto-ordering (on fly), the other is about manual ordering and keeping the sequence. For two years those reports were not duplicates and nothing has changed since. Reopening. (In reply to comment #2) > This report is about auto-ordering (on fly), the other is about manual ordering > and keeping the sequence. This bug is "I want to order the applications using a list", bug #170476 is "I want to set the exact order of the application". No difference. The list is the effect (in systray), as in those examples, but settings for this report is quite simpler. Automatically sort systray entries: ( ) by name (*) by entry time Ok, so? I still don't see how the two reports actually differ (if not adding a «(*) sort manually» option to the option list you just did), nor how there's actually written one wants "on the fly" sorting and the other "manual". I think this is a dup too. Duplicate means -- solving report A means solving report B. Here is not the case, but because of time I am linking this one as duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 170476 *** |