| Summary: | MAINTENANCE : add advanced statistics for all images for each albums | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | Christian Mayer <bug> |
| Component: | Maintenance-Database | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
| Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | CC: | aevseev, caulier.gilles, Julien, piotr270977, tpr |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version: | 0.9.2 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Ubuntu | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Christian Mayer
2007-10-23 14:02:47 UTC
Christian, The new database format used with new 0.10.0 release (KDE4) will store these values. http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/graphics/digikam/DBSCHEMA.ODS?view=log Gilles Caulier Gilles, then I did guess correctly. So I only want an "histogram" of the information in ImageMetadata for all pictures in the selected folder(s). Doing a good histogram for this is non-trivial: According to my experience with a home-brew solution, the bin-width to be chosen very much depends on the number of entries. Moreover, it can become very spiked. And a separation according to lenses would be helpful as well. Also: where should one put such a statistical information? Maybe another side-bar could carry the needed plots, together with a selection of all lenses or specific lenses. > According to my experience with a home-brew solution, > the bin-width to be chosen very much depends on the number of entries. Yes, that's not that easy. If there's no easy way to determine the width (I'd *try* e.g. (max-min)/10 or 20...) it could be made setable. A custom query could help here. How many pictures have a focal length > 100mm? > Moreover, it can become very spiked. Why not? I'm interested in the values and not in an "pretty" histogram... > And a separation according to lenses would be helpful as well. As an option/filter: yes. But *I* am mainly interested in all pictures at once (as I want to decide which type of lens I should buy next) > Also: where should one put such a statistical information? I was thinking of a right click context menu (e.g. named "Statistics") - but an side bar also would be fine. Having read this conversation at flickr http://www.flickr.com/groups/olympus_e500/discuss/72157594427198068 I thought it would be pretty useful and a nice feature to digikam! So, here comes my vote for this "bug" errrr wish ;) I saw this link: http://www.cpr.demon.nl/prog_plotf.html posted on http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1037&message=27818592 I thought it would be a nifty feature for digikam, and apparently I'm not alone ;-) /Simon *** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. *** I think this wish would be a nice addition. But I think that first this wish http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=180322 should be solved, because for the statistics, the proper 35mm equivalent focal length is needed. Here is an example of what it could look like : http://flickr.com/photos/dartar/2108504971/in/set-310890/ Here is an utility to do that on your flickr pictures: http://stats.ghusse.com/ Julien Now I have the same question / task as 6 years ago - and the new DB should be working... What's the status here? *** Bug 286778 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** This would be such a nice addition, but think the status is that the information is available in the database, but there's no one working on it. About what was mentioned in comment #8, it looks like digikam shows the 35mm equivalent focal length in the UI, but it is not stored in the database? *** Bug 331457 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Thank you for the bug report. As this report hasn't seen any changes in 5 years or more, we ask if you can please confirm that the issue still persists. If this bug is no longer persisting or relevant please change the status to resolved. |