Summary: | custom metadata readout and creation (id3v2) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] amarok | Reporter: | Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab> |
Component: | Metadata Editing and Reading | Assignee: | Amarok Developers <amarok-bugs-dist> |
Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
Severity: | wishlist | CC: | 123kash, arne_bab, bjoernv, btsai, dev+kde, michael.zugaro, ralf-engels, siegmund, subscriber, wheeler, wildboyz123 |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Gentoo Packages | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | 2.4.1 | |
Sentry Crash Report: | |||
Attachments: | example of how this could look like |
Description
Arne Babenhauserheide
2007-02-20 17:25:16 UTC
sorry, we don't do any meta tag reading ourselves. i'll reassign to taglib. *** Bug 143455 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** TagLib does support this, moving back to Amarok. It's an issue of deciding if it fits in the UI and that's up to you guys. *** Bug 226836 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** We support itunes compilation TCMP tag now with 2.4 Also we try to fulfill the id2v3 specification regarding tags. Can you specify what other tags you need? How exactly would you want to customize them? Thank you! I would like to be able to add custom fields, so Amarok can read any kind of (potentially patologic) tagging. Hi Arne, this "wish" has already 60 votes (which means that at least three people assigned 20 points to it). Maybe you could propose how this should work and look in the user interface. Maybe make a sketch. *** Bug 225977 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Thats' how I would imagine this to look like -> http://image.bayimg.com/eaojeaada.jpg a click on "Add custom tag field" would open a dialog for the user to enter the desired tag field with a save/ok and cancel button. Very important feature for me since i have some custom tag fields and I invested a lot of time creating them. relaxed evening, noobie Created attachment 71380 [details]
example of how this could look like
example of how this could look like
*** Bug 305087 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 305087 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** If this were implemented would the ability to search on such custom fields automatically come with it, or should that be another feature request? I'd love to be able to search by conductor. |