Bug 126103

Summary:	kmail become slow when using search line filter with 10000+ mails
Product:	[Applications] kmail	Reporter:	LuRan <hephooey_dev>
Component:	general	Assignee:	kdepim bugs <kdepim-bugs>
Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE
Severity:	wishlist	CC:	f.faber-pro
Priority:	NOR
Version:	unspecified
Target Milestone:	---
Platform:	Compiled Sources
OS:	Linux
Latest Commit:		Version Fixed In:

Description LuRan 2006-04-23 13:28:04 UTC

Version:           svn snapshot from 3.5 branch (using KDE Devel)
Installed from:    Compiled sources
Compiler:          gcc 4.1.0 
OS:                Linux

I have a mailbox with 10000+ mails, when I use the search line to search for some
keywords, kmail become very slow, either scrolling the result or rightclick on a
mail. Even switching to another window and then switch back will make it hang for
about 2s on my athlon-xp 2500+.

Comment 1 tropikhajma 2006-11-29 20:39:55 UTC

confirm this one at Mandriva Cooker, KDE 3.5.5, KMail 1.9.5
Not only is the search a bit slow, even worse - it seems, that the search is performed at every UI refresh, i.e.:
0) launch top
1) perform a quick search on a folder with 40k+ messages and wait for CPU to get back to 0
2) minimize and maximize KMail (or move the scrollbar or whatever)
3) watch it eating your CPU again

the only solution is to use the full search

Comment 2 LuRan 2006-12-17 13:05:12 UTC

I spent some time to debug the problem, and I found that the bad guy is the alternative background of KListView, after comment out the code in klistview.cpp, the slowness went away.

Comment 3 Thomas McGuire 2007-02-21 17:39:09 UTC

*** Bug 126683 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 FACORAT Fabrice 2007-02-21 17:53:31 UTC

could something be done about this ?

Comment 5 Pavel Volkovitskiy 2007-02-22 10:02:28 UTC

related KListView bug
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138912

Comment 6 Bram Schoenmakers 2007-02-25 21:39:19 UTC

Marking as a dupe of bug 138912, most probably it describes the general cause for this problem.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 138912 ***