Summary: | c++ code generated without rdoc comments using new code generator | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] umbrello | Reporter: | Christoph Hoeger <choeger> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | Umbrello Development Group <umbrello-devel> |
Status: | REPORTED --- | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | ralf.habacker |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Fedora RPMs | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Christoph Hoeger
2006-02-20 13:45:38 UTC
Edit: It seems that umbrello does export rdoc comments, when there is no other comment defined for an operation. I think it would be better to have both kinds of comments. This bug its present at 1.5.2 version too. The comments of the parameters entered by the user are ignored by the code generator. I have tried with C++ and Doxygen not rdoc. I am a bit lost with this bug. According to me, this doesn't still exist in 1.5.7. The comments entered by the user are written by the code generator in Java, C++ and Ruby. > The comments entered by the user are written by the code generator in Java,
> C++ and Ruby.
It may be that the original poster was using the Advanced Code Generators
which have been disabled due to stability problems.
Also he mentions getter/setter methods autogenerated for attributes.
It may well be that no doc is generated on those - I haven't checked.
At any rate, IMHO the doc at the attribute itself should suffice, and
should not be replicated at the accessor methods.
> but these comments do not appear for my own operations and their parameters.
in 2.15.1 generated c++ code includes comments for operations but not for parameters
Thank you for the bug report. As this report hasn't seen any changes in 5 years or more, we ask if you can please confirm that the issue still persists. If this bug is no longer persisting or relevant please change the status to resolved. |