Summary: | Great improvements that could be made | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | Iuri Matias <iuri.matias> |
Component: | Tags-Engine | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED NOT A BUG | ||
Severity: | wishlist | CC: | caulier.gilles |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 0.8.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Slackware | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | 7.6.0 |
Description
Iuri Matias
2005-11-17 21:02:26 UTC
"the photo with amarok" = "the photo with konqueror" Please file a report for every wish or bug you have. How should we track the report, when one option was implemented but another is still waiting? And use a descriptive title. Thanks Has the original bug reporter or anyone else actually split this into three different bug reports? Because I agree with at least his first and third suggestions. If anyone hasn't done the splitting, I could do it myself, let me know. If someone *has* done it, please comment this bug report with links to the new ones. helder, it doesnt seem so... i didnt like the atitude from joern, i was just trying to help. i stopped using digikam There is no reason to take Joerns advice as a personal offense. Digkam project has about 200 bug reports open, so all the things he pointed out are VALID. Bug tracking can not be done like this and the devels spend to much time cleaning bug reports anyway. So if you realy want to help or get your wishes in, please correct your report as adviced. In the end of cause it is your choise which apps you use and which not. Don't get me wrong, "miscommunication" can happen (and happen to me often, too). But if the devs ask you to correct/improve certain thinks, pls. try to do so. And take into account that most of us are NOT native English speakers, so thinks _might_ sound rude sometimes without the intention of the author. |