Bug 113460

Summary:	kword odt output can not be read by openoffice swriter
Product:	kword	Reporter:	Richard Bos <richard.bos>
Component:	general	Assignee:	Thomas Zander <zander>
Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE
Severity:	normal	CC:	maarizwan
Priority:	NOR
Version:	1.5 or before
Target Milestone:	---
Platform:	openSUSE
OS:	Linux
Latest Commit:		Version Fixed In:
Attachments:	Test document in odt format

Description Richard Bos 2005-09-27 22:12:13 UTC

Version:           1.4.1 (using KDE KDE 3.4.2)
Installed from:    SuSE RPMs
OS:                Linux

This is maybe not a kword bug, but I think it is the best way to start.  Anyway I was able to make a nice looking page containing some tabstops that should be valid for the whole
page.  The good thing is that this was very easy to do with
kword, while 2 others (msword and swriter) let me down on this!

The attached document shows perfectly fine in kword, but
in OOo it does not show the 3 lines in the table that are
formatted using tabstops.  Who is to blame kword or OOo?

Comment 1 Richard Bos 2005-09-27 22:14:16 UTC

Created attachment 12739 [details]
Test document in odt format

Test document that shows well in kword.
In swriter the 3 lines in the middle are not shown.

Comment 2 David Faure 2005-09-27 23:52:27 UTC

Yes, swriter doesn't support <text:numbered-paragraph> yet.
See http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52127

I have mailed the OOo developers about this today, they really have to fix this soon...

Comment 3 David Faure 2005-09-27 23:53:19 UTC

ah, wanted to close as duplicate, in fact.

Comment 4 David Faure 2005-09-27 23:55:02 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 107820 ***

Comment 5 Richard Bos 2005-09-28 19:58:51 UTC

David,

thanks for your swift reply.  I found bug 107820 before opening this
one, but I was not sure whether it was about the same problem.
Appearently it is.

Comment 6 Richard Bos 2005-09-29 19:10:41 UTC

I don't it will be fixed soon.  On the contrary OOo
just released OOo-2.0rc1:
http://download.openoffice.org/2.0.0rc/index.html

Comment 7 Maksim Orlovich 2005-10-16 00:50:23 UTC

*** Bug 114471 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***