Summary: | Local versus global shortcuts | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] amarok | Reporter: | skrald <skrald> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | Amarok Developers <amarok-bugs-dist> |
Status: | RESOLVED INTENTIONAL | ||
Severity: | wishlist | ||
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Debian testing | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
skrald
2005-03-11 14:15:37 UTC
The shortcut dialogs are integral part of KDELIBS. They're part of the standard KDE look-and-feel. Closing wontfix, as we're not gonna leave the KDE path here. HIG is the word. Fair enough, I agree with the decision of following the KDE path (even though I think KDE has choosen the wrong strategy here). What about listing all actions in both configuration windows? Then the user still has an oppotunity to make every action local/global. Also an action could maybe be marked grey in the list in the one window if it already has a shortcut assignment in the other window. I agree with skrald /the first and the last comment/ -- HIG should be for humans, right? Where is place for switchable shorcuts? None. There have to be switch-on something shortcut, and separate switch-off. Not flexible, not user-friendly. But I think it is good time to also make a report for kdelibs :-). > Closing wontfix
Btw. what with the easier solution? Make two sections in the shortcuts -- global and local. It is possible, other apps /konqueror, kmail/ have shortcuts organized that way.
|