Version: 0.7 (using KDE KDE 3.3.1) Installed from: Debian testing/unstable Packages OS: Linux In the thumbnail view it should be easier to switch between the tag view, the album view and the collection view. For example, you're browsing all images tagged with tag "Paul", you now find a specific picture and would like to change to the album or collection containing this picture. This could be done by adding a "Goto" section to the context menu of image-thumbs. For example: Goto -> Collection Album Tag --> All Tags (would require search based on many tags as requested by 91849) Tag A Tag B .... (shows all tags assigned to the image) Best Regards Bernhard
I really wish, this wish would be fulfilled.. It is very annoying if you have an image and want to view the album of that image, but can't easily get there...
I missed the easy jump from tags to album feature too. At least for the 'goto album' one may also think about making the Album header(s) in the thumbnail view clickable. Achim
BTW - I Collection view and Album view should be merged. At the moment there is confusion when creating new albums where they go. For example when creating new album in Collection view it usually goes as subalbum of clicked album but it is placed in other collection (unclassified). Sorting this out is troublesome. Maybe make rule that all subalbums belong to collection of master album. I think this is quite sane assumption.
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***
After a search or filtering by tag we presently get the list of thumbs separated by folders. A very simple way of switching to the corresponding folder would be to make the folder name a hyperlink which brings one to the corresponding folder. This would not work, if all resulting images are shown jointly, i.e. without folder-separation and e.g. sorted by date, as discussed in another B.K.O. For this something as proposed in #1 would be needed. Another related point: one could even make elements displayed below the thumb clickable: clicking on a tag brings one to all images with that tag etc. etc. (but maybe this belongs to the featurities department ;-)
Just one more tiny addition: for the right-click "Goto Album" it would be nice if then the album is displayed with this image as active image.
Created attachment 21556 [details] provide goto album/date in the icon view This patch (many thanks to Gilles for his help!) provides a new entry to the right-mouse-click menu in the album view to go to the folder of a given image (when in tags/searches or date view) or to the images of the same date (when in folder/searches or tags view). There is one important issue: when the destination view contains many images, it may happen that the current image (ie. the one from which the goto is invoked) is not marked as current. To me the reason seems that in void AlbumIconView::refreshIcon(AlbumIconItem* item) this AlbumIconItem* icon = findItem(d->itemUrlToFind.url()); is called too early before the particular item is available in the list. What are possible solutions? - should one retry a couple of times (with a short delay?) (but for how long - this might be system dependent) - is there a signal when all items are listed? However this could lead to unnecessary waiting times if the image is already available. The relevant sections in the code are marked by FIXME.
Created attachment 21695 [details] goto album and date added to right pop-up menu Marcel pointed out the solution the remaining problem (for long result lists the correct item was not made visible). At last it seems to work! Please test thoroughly, it would be great if this could go into 0.9.3 ;-).
Agree to include it in 0.9.3... Mik, if you have few moment, can you test this patch and report if all work fine for you. I will review it later. I have others stuff on my TODO list to solve before. Gilles
For me works perfectly in each case. Few comments: 1. Critical: "Go To", not "Goto" 2. Wish: Is it possible to add "Tag" target with submenu if many tags applied to image? 3. Bug?: Often I'd like to return to previous view, regardless of its type (Search, Date, Tag, Album) but after moving with "Go to" I am going to some strange place. Apart from 1. nothing is really bad. Attaching Go To patch. Created an attachment (id=21698) goto.diff
Excelent Mik. Thanks ! Arnd, your viewpoint for 2/ and 3/ ? Gilles
I should probably elaborate: "strange place" means that it is definitely not former view. I couldn't track any rule in what it is. Sometimes it is album, sometimes date, sometimes something different. Tag going feature would be nice but it is definitely not showstopper. Also in future it will become common wish so it is probably best to include it from beginning (if possible). After few hours of sleep I don't think submenu is good thing. List of applied tags shouldn't be very long and could be integrated into "Go To" menu, maybe after separator. ----------------------------------------------------
Created attachment 21701 [details] also allow goto tag Mikolaj, thanks a lot for testing! 1/ Of course you are right! Still I think that "Go to" would be even better. OK? (Actually the same in the menu below: "Open With" -> "Open with") 2/ I had a look at it, implemented apart from one problem, see my technical question below. (However, I think adding a submenu is technically simpler, well, let's first get the functionality working) 3/ I tried a couple of cases, but it seems to work fine here. So presumably I am using a different ordering. Could you describe a sequence in which this happens (Actually, I was about to ask, what is the "strange place", i.e. a different folder or a wrong image, but then your previous message arrived.) Hmm, so this needs further debugging find out a reproducible scheme for this issue... However, what I do observe is that when going to a Date view, there is an empty entry in the history for the Back/Forward entries. Note that this also happens without the patch. I.e., this is a different bug ;-). I also just realized, that goto was even possible when more than one item is selected. In this case I disable the goto menu. OK? Now the technical question for Gilles concerning /2: I use TagsPopupMenu::REMOVE for this purpose: TagsPopupMenu* gotoTagsPopup = new TagsPopupMenu(selectedImageIDs, 1000, TagsPopupMenu::REMOVE); int gotoTagId = gotoMenu.insertItem(i18n("Tag"), gotoTagsPopup); connect(gotoTagsPopup, SIGNAL(signalTagActivated(int)), this, SLOT(slotGotoTag(int))); In the new routine void AlbumIconView::slotGotoTag(int tagID) I would like to emit signalGotoTagAndItem(tagID, iconItem); but I don't have the iconItem at hand. Is there a simple way to pass the iconItem through via the connect? Another important point: In slotGotoTag I need the void selectItem(int id); from tagfolderview.cpp, however it is defined in protected. Is it ok to move it into public, or should a different approach be used? (It seems to work though ...;-) Thanks, Arnd
> 1/ Of course you are right! Still I think that "Go to" would be even > better. > OK? No. It is KDE convention to use caps in that situation. > 2/ I had a look at it, implemented apart from one problem, > see my technical question below. > (However, I think adding a submenu is technically simpler, well, > let's first get the functionality working) I have no doubts it is technically easier but from usability point of view submenu is bad. > 3/ I tried a couple of cases, but it seems to work fine here. > So presumably I am using a different ordering. I will make more tests in the evening. > However, what I do observe is that when going to a Date view, > there is an empty entry in the history for the Back/Forward > entries. Note that this also happens without the patch. > I.e., this is a different bug ;-). Also noticed this and was preparing bug report :) > I also just realized, that goto was even possible when more > than one item is selected. In this case I disable the goto menu. OK ---------------------------------------------------- Tolo - muszkieter z Dywizjonu 303. Historia Tola
Created attachment 21709 [details] goto patch, origin of empty dates in history found The origin of the empty entries in the history for date folders is that in album.cpp the title was not defined. With the following change at least a reasonable title is displayed. DAlbum::DAlbum(const QDate& date, bool root) : Album(Album::DATE, root ? 0 : ++m_uniqueID, root), m_date(date) { // Set the name of the album // FIXME - could there be an internationalization issue here? QString date_title = date.toString("ddd MMM d yyyy"); setTitle(date_title); } However, I am not sure, whether this is ok for internationalization issues. Also the format might be subject to discussion, in particular, if only a month is selected, and not an individual day/week. (Not sure if this can be detected...)
Arnd, #15 KDE API can help to format date as string : KDE3 : QString str = KGlobal::locale()->formatDateTime(dateTime, true, true); KDE4 : QString str = KGlobal::locale()->formatDateTime(dateTime, KLocale::ShortDate, true); Gilles
Created attachment 21710 [details] better date formatting Mikolaj, it would be great, if you could have a test with the updated version. Also, I am not sure whether the history problem also exists normally (i.e. without the patch) when changing album views....
Tested it and problem with history and changing album views doesn't without your patch. BTW I played more with this feature and this is really great! If you and Gilles cannot reproduce this I think you can risk and include it in 9.3 .
> Tested it and problem with history and changing album views doesn't > without your patch. Sorry, just to understand it correctly: are you saying a) there is no problem when changing album views (date, tag, physical album) when the patch is not applied. Only if the patch is applied, problems arise already for changing albums (even without using the "Go To" functionality) b) there are problems with the history when using the goto functionality (i.e. when the patch is applied and using "Go To") ? Thanks for testing! Arnd
From Gerahrd, out B.K.O (directly on ML: I tested it too before I make the tarballs. I played around with it (improved date formating patch applied) and found no problem whatsoever. I think we should include it into 0.9.3, it is a great feature. Gerhard
To all, I'm waiting than : - Arnd, include fix from Gerhard in this room, - Mik, test the new patch, - Arnd finalize the patch accordinly... An after i do a full review to be applied to svn by Arnd. Of course i will backport on trunk just after. It' not urgent to apply it on 0.9.3-beta1. The patch must be finalized properly before to be public. We can delay publish on beta2 : i prefer a code finely finalized (:=))) Gilles
Gilles, Mikolaj: there is no patch by Gerhard. So we are already at the next step: Mikolaj, if you have time, could you give the new one a try (also with the goto tags functionality). Thanks a lot, Arnd
Sorry, I was imprecise and make some more tests (with and without latest patch). There are some problems with history even without goto patch. I am not able to reproduce them each time (maybe it depends on some special settings of particular albums?) and cannot construct example but they exists. With goto patch they are much more visible but only when using goto functionality. When using normal history it behaves like without goto patch. To sum up: 1. Without goto patch: almost invisible problems. 2. With goto patch, normal history: almost invisible problems. 3. With goto patch, after using "Go To": general screw up. My opinion is: if no one apart from me is able to reproduce this bug: apply it to 0.9.3 . In worst case we will have more reports, and it will be possible to catch some common ground.
Hi Mikolaj, thanks a lot for testing! The fact that there is no clear pattern might have to do with different lengths of the result lists (i.e. because images are listed in packages of 200), but this is just a speculation. Also, Gerhard mentioned yesterday on the IRC: """There is a small problem with history: when you 'go to' album or tags from either oher view then the last access page of the new view is inserted as previous page""" I will try to find the place where things get screwed ... Arnd
Created attachment 21740 [details] slightly more polished patch I looked around a bit through the code, but I did not understand why/when the previous item is inserted into the album history when going eg. from date view to album view.Somehow one gets the feeling that it does not happen always (but it is difficult to track down, because one has to write down the albums one is actually visiting on a sheet of paper and compare with the history, so that one does not get completely confused). Gilles, maybe you will immediately see the orign of the problem if you have review the patch (sorry, it's a long one ...)
Arnd, Long or not, it will need to study your patch (:=))) So, i will do it, but let's me finalize my big Xmp patch for KDE4 branch... Gilles
Looks like problems when jumping between albums and tags vanished. Also first few jumps to date view are working. Only with more complex history paths things are messed.
I just found this entry about problems with the history, http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148596 so it seems that it is not (or at least not exclusively ;-) my patch causing it ...
Created attachment 21950 [details] new patch version reviewed Few coding style polish + icons add on pop-up menu. Arnd, 1/ Note than we will certainly need the same "Go To" sub menu in Image menu from Album Gui... 2/ I will check indeep your TODO in DigikamView::slotGotoTagAndItem(), after than your patch is commited in svn. Gilles
SVN commit 731105 by abaecker: New entry of the right-mouse-click menu in the album view to go to the folder of a given image (when in tags/searches or date view) or to the images of the same date (when in folder/searches or tags view). CCBUGS: 96894 TODO:KDE4PORT M +3 -2 NEWS M +3 -0 digikam/album.cpp M +11 -0 digikam/albumfolderview.cpp M +2 -0 digikam/albumfolderview.h M +113 -12 digikam/albumiconview.cpp M +11 -1 digikam/albumiconview.h M +24 -0 digikam/datefolderview.cpp M +3 -1 digikam/datefolderview.h M +80 -7 digikam/digikamview.cpp M +9 -2 digikam/digikamview.h M +7 -0 digikam/iconview.cpp M +2 -0 digikam/iconview.h M +3 -3 digikam/tagfolderview.h M +1 -0 digikam/welcomepageview.cpp WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=731105
SVN commit 731198 by cgilles: digiKAm from trunk (KDE4) : backport commit #731105 from KDE3 branch: New entry of the right-mouse-click menu in the album view to go to the folder of a given image (when in tags/searches or date view) or to the images of the same date (when in folder/searches or tags view). BUG: 96894 M +3 -0 album.cpp M +11 -0 albumfolderview.cpp M +2 -0 albumfolderview.h M +112 -14 albumiconview.cpp M +11 -0 albumiconview.h M +40 -5 datefolderview.cpp M +3 -1 datefolderview.h M +84 -8 digikamview.cpp M +9 -0 digikamview.h M +5 -0 iconview.cpp M +4 -0 iconview.h M +2 -2 tagfolderview.h WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=731198
I appreciate the fix for this bug, but I think it could be improved by making this behaviour default when switching views. So when I select an image in Tag view, and I switch to Album view, I would like the Album view to keep the same image selected. I'm not sure how/if this would work with multiple image selection, but when one image is selected, I expect the image thumbnail to stay visible when I switch views. Should I open a new wish? /Simon
Simon, yes, please open a new wish. This one is closed and has already a lot of comments. Thanks a lot, Arnd