Bug 95400 - konqueror does not split the lines. So text does not fit screen width.
Summary: konqueror does not split the lines. So text does not fit screen width.
Status: RESOLVED NOT A BUG
Alias: None
Product: konqueror
Classification: Applications
Component: khtml (other bugs)
Version First Reported In: 3.3.2
Platform: unspecified Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Konqueror Bugs
URL:
Keywords:
: 95596 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-12-18 18:02 UTC by Peter Volkov
Modified: 2004-12-21 23:16 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed/Implemented In:
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Peter Volkov 2004-12-18 18:02:45 UTC
Version:           3.3.2 (using KDE 3.3.2, Gentoo)
Compiler:          gcc version 3.3.4 20040623 (Gentoo Linux 3.3.4-r1, ssp-3.3.2-2, pie-8.7.6)
OS:                Linux (i686) release 2.6.9-gentoo-r9

Hello.

Look for example at this url:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40987

The text is not splited on lines, so it's hard to read.

Thank you for your attention,
__________
Peter.
Comment 1 Allan Sandfeld 2004-12-18 18:18:36 UTC
I've seen the same behavior on slashdot recently. Very odd
Comment 2 Thiago Macieira 2004-12-18 18:43:55 UTC
There's a <pre> in there.
Comment 3 Maksim Orlovich 2004-12-18 18:48:33 UTC
There is absolutely nothing weird here, Carewolf. That's how <pre> looks when one doesn't support white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; or other similar modes 
(see http://bugs.gentoo.org/css/edit_bug.css)
Comment 4 Allan Sandfeld 2004-12-18 19:11:47 UTC
Ah okay. Then the bug in slashdot is a different one, that makes more sense.

We will never support -moz-pre-wrap, but pre-wrap is in CSS 2.1 and CSS3 candidate recommendation, so at you can reopen the bug as a wish for white-space: pre-wrap. 
Comment 5 Peter Volkov 2004-12-19 10:30:42 UTC
There is already bug that after your discussion seems similar to me:
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26326

And even more similar:
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82906
that marked as duplicate of the first one.

So I think it's not necessary to reopen this bug as a wish. Am I wrong or right?
Comment 6 Maksim Orlovich 2004-12-21 23:16:15 UTC
*** Bug 95596 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***