Bug 93947 - wish configurable for blocking time for fetching feeds
Summary: wish configurable for blocking time for fetching feeds
Status: RESOLVED INTENTIONAL
Alias: None
Product: akregator
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kdepim bugs
URL:
Keywords:
: 102877 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-11-26 06:35 UTC by m.wege
Modified: 2005-11-22 01:12 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description m.wege 2004-11-26 06:35:52 UTC
Version:           1.0-beta7 "Lippel" (using KDE 3.3.1,  (3.1))
Compiler:          gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-2)
OS:                Linux (i686) release 2.6.8.1-kanotix-5

Some feeds (e.g. Slashdot) amount of times you can fetch a feed within a time. If you do not comply you are blocked for a time, which is enoying. To prevent this, you can put seeting in a way that you comply to that policy, but if for example you restart computer or use a fetch all, you don't comply with this policy because the feed is fetched again. What I would like to have is a seeting for singular feeds, that prevents me from fetching a feed more often than allowed by blocking it fetching more often than in set timeframe.
Comment 1 Frank Osterfeld 2004-11-26 09:05:14 UTC
There was a bug in interval fetching which caused that all feeds were fetched one minute after the start of akregator. This is fixed now, akregator remembers the last fetch time. 
The only way to fetch more often than specified in the interval is pressing "Fetch" or "Fetch All" manually (And, if the feed is not available, akregator retries every minute).

Do you think such a "fetch prevention" is necessary for manual fetch actions or does the new interval fetch behaviour fit your needs?
Comment 2 m.wege 2004-11-26 09:18:29 UTC
> Do you think such a "fetch prevention" is necessary for manual fetch actions > or does the new interval fetch behaviour fit your needs? 
I think it would be still useful.
Comment 3 George Staikos 2004-12-03 07:23:58 UTC
I disagree.  If I press "Fetch", I expect it to fetch no matter what.  I think this is a bad idea, and the current behaviour is sufficient.
Comment 4 Frank Osterfeld 2004-12-03 10:59:43 UTC
I agree, I consider such a feature as confusing. We should follow the Keep-It-Simple principle here.
First, fetch would not work like expected, second you got a cluttered UI and third, who presses "Fetch All" every minute? (you have to be very bored to do so ;) ). 
Comment 5 Eckhart Wörner 2005-05-22 19:38:04 UTC
*** Bug 102877 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Frank Osterfeld 2005-11-22 01:12:41 UTC
Everything was said in #4.