Bug 92962 - Option for number-up-layout=???? (page ordering on multiple pages) missing in kprinter
Summary: Option for number-up-layout=???? (page ordering on multiple pages) missing in...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 97669
Alias: None
Product: kdeprint
Classification: Unmaintained
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Gentoo Packages Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: KDEPrint Devel Mailinglist
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-11-09 11:42 UTC by Ralph von der Heyden
Modified: 2009-01-05 23:11 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:

Attachments
Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ralph von der Heyden 2004-11-09 11:42:50 UTC 
Version:            (using KDE KDE 3.3.1)
Installed from:    Gentoo Packages
Compiler:          gcc version 3.3.4 20040623 (Gentoo Linux 3.3.4-r1, ssp-3.3.2-2, pie-8.7.6) 
OS:                Linux

Hello!

When printing multiple pages per sheet with kprinter, the page ordering does not always make sense (e.g. when printing pdfs generated from powerpoint slides, which I do print quite frequently).

So it would be great if you added a frontend option for manipulating the cups option number-up-layout=???? (e.g. for the above purpose btlr would make most sense).
--
Ralph
Comment 1 Kurt Pfeifle 2005-01-23 05:53:25 UTC 
Please have a look at this bug report and the ongoing discussion:

  http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97669

You will find that this is essentially a duplicate of your report. See if the advices and hints given there will help you to solve your problem. Plese give your feedback at http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97669

I will close this bug report as "duplicate" -- but this doesnt mean we didnt value your input.

Thank you,
Kurt


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 97669 ***
Comment 2 Stephan Kulow 2005-10-20 09:55:15 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 97669 ***
Comment 3 John Layt 2008-12-31 17:41:23 UTC 
Closing old Resolved status bug.