Bug 88732 - bloomberg.com renders very poorly
Summary: bloomberg.com renders very poorly
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 70363
Alias: None
Product: konqueror
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: 3.3
Platform: unspecified FreeBSD
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Konqueror Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-09-03 05:07 UTC by mi+kde
Modified: 2004-09-03 18:31 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description mi+kde 2004-09-03 05:07:44 UTC
Version:           3.3 (using KDE 3.3.0, compiled sources)
Compiler:          gcc version 3.4.2 [FreeBSD] 20040728
OS:                FreeBSD (i386) release 5.2-CURRENT

Although the site is doubtless "optimized for IE", it renders fine with Mozilla.

Konqueror, on the other hand, seems to never be able to catch up with the site's constant self-reloading.
Comment 1 Chris Howells 2004-09-03 10:05:04 UTC
Please describe in more detail what's wrong with the site and its "constant self-reloading". I loaded the page here and it looked just fine.
Comment 2 mi+kde 2004-09-03 16:37:42 UTC
The site has auto-update mechanism, which reloads the charts and the ads every so often.

Where I am, accessing the site is very slow for some reason (huge latency despite decent bandwidth), and by the time all pictures are loaded, it comes time to reload. But reloading takes just as long, so I never see the page complete -- the rectangle on the left keeps saying "LOADING CHARTS". I'd blame the site, but Mozilla manages to show (and update) it properly. Is Mozilla's caching better tuned?
Comment 3 mi+kde 2004-09-03 16:41:58 UTC
May be, this is because I have Flash-plugin installed, and it takes a while to load the flash file(s)?

Actually, this morning it is not as bad as last night. May be, a temporary connectivity glitch of some sort...
Comment 4 Germain Garand 2004-09-03 18:31:15 UTC
doucleclick.net ads...
I already sent them 4 mails. No reply.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 70363 ***