Bug 79429 - specification of yearly recurrence jumps back to "recur on this day"
Summary: specification of yearly recurrence jumps back to "recur on this day"
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 74365
Alias: None
Product: korganizer
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: 3.1.1
Platform: unspecified Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Cornelius Schumacher
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-04-11 15:07 UTC by Hans Gerd Evertz
Modified: 2004-06-08 10:26 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Hans Gerd Evertz 2004-04-11 15:07:17 UTC
Version:           3.1.1 (using KDE 3.1.5)
Installed from:     (testing/unstable)
Compiler:          gcc version 3.3.3 20031229 (prerelease) (Debian)
OS:          Linux (i686) release 2.4.22-xfs

1) Specification of annually recurring events: 
  Click on "recur in the month of".
  Then one has to specify the month which nonsensically is January        by default instead of the month of the current entry.
  After hitting OK, this results in the correct recurrence also in leap  years  (e.g. always on March 2)
BUT:
2) Returning to the same menu later, I always find the button 
   "recur on this year" checked, which would mean WRONG 
   entries on leap years, though the entries remain correct.

Completely confusing !
(The wordings are also confusing, I agree with what is said below
 by Reinhold Kainhofer)

As described in the comments to bug 46711
(Comment #6 From Reinhold Kainhofer 2003-09-08 16:44):
 -) "Recur in the month of ..." means the recurrence is always on the same date 
 (e.g. Sept 8, be it the 251-th or the 252-th day of the year) 
 
 -) "Recur on this day" means the event recurs on the same day of the year 
 (e.g. on the 251-th day of the year, which is usually Sept 8, but in leap 
 years it's Sept 7). This is the button that is checked by default (which it 
 shouldn't be imo). 

Thanks.
Comment 1 Reinhold Kainhofer 2004-06-08 10:26:35 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 74365 ***