Version: 3.0.0b2 (using KDE 3.1.4) Installed from: Gentoo Compiler: gcc version 3.2.3 20030422 (Gentoo Linux 1.4 3.2.3-r2, propolice) OS: Linux (i686) release 2.4.23 In Beta 1, the auto-format feature would align parameters of a function after the opening parenthesis as in: foobarfoobar(int param1, .............int param2, .............int param3) In Beta 2, this changed so that the function definition comes out like: foobarclass::foobarfoobar(int param1, ....int param2, ....int param3) Which makes the format function useless to me because of company formatting standards. I'd like to see a customization option to support both methods, since this is obviously a matter of taste. (In the above examples, I replaced the white space with periods.)
Which Text editor? KATE or QEditor. Are you talking about a Qeditor feature or about the "reformat source" item on the edit menu? AFAIK none of this code was touched beteewn b1 and b2 !
Subject: Re: I would like to see a auto-format customization item to control alignment of parameters for function definitions. The 'reformat source' item in the edit menu. The shortcut I normally use is ALT-F, although I can't remember if this is a default, or something I customized. The reason I noticed is that the behavior changed for a bug I had reported before (recently closed) which was that C type functions and C++ functions behaved differently. This bug was fixed in B1 to work one way, and then behavior changed to the other way in B2. Actually, I think both ways are reasonable, I just happen to have to follow a code standard that goes as described above. Hence the wish item. On Thursday 11 December 2003 05:37 am, Amilcar do Carmo Lucas wrote: > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. > > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70071 > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From a.lucas@tu-bs.de 2003-12-11 11:37 ------- > Which Text editor? KATE or QEditor. > > Are you talking about a Qeditor feature or about the "reformat source" item > on the edit menu? > > AFAIK none of this code was touched beteewn b1 and b2 ! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/2Jjd8XjOGQDr37YRAtI+AJwNhcn/YM2CYL5wlo2o+rfuhNTcYwCffFeT CnpCyiTKU6o0Aq25IHggBd0= =rlwx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This is an astyle bug/wish and as such should be filed upstream.