Bug 66874 - Ability to choose whether window should be minimized or closed when pressing close button
Summary: Ability to choose whether window should be minimized or closed when pressing ...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 63480
Alias: None
Product: kmail
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: 1.5.93
Platform: unspecified Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kdepim bugs
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-10-29 23:54 UTC by Teemu Rytilahti
Modified: 2007-09-14 12:17 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:

Attachments
Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Teemu Rytilahti 2003-10-29 23:54:47 UTC 
Version:           1.5.93 (using KDE 3.1.92 (CVS >= 20031019), compiled sources)
Compiler:          gcc version 3.2.3 (Debian)
OS:          Linux (i686) release 2.6.0-test9

When the tray icon is shown always, it'd be nice if it'd minimize to the tray when pressing the decoration's close button, like JuK does.. 

So I think there should be an option to select what does it do when tray icon is shown always, because it's too easy to click the close button when you want it to the tray..
Comment 1 Ingo Klöcker 2003-10-30 00:39:32 UTC 
Subject: Re:  New: Ability to choose whether window should =?iso-8859-1?q?be=09minimized_or_closed_when_pressing_close?= button

Unfortunately this wish comes too late for KDE 3.2. In case you didn't 
know already: You can simply click on the tray icon to hide KMail's 
main window.
Comment 2 Teemu Rytilahti 2003-10-30 02:18:43 UTC 
Yeah, I know the both :) But it'd be nice to see this somewhen after the 3.2_RELEASE.. At last in KDE3.3...
Comment 3 Thiago Macieira 2003-10-31 15:50:49 UTC 
Hmm... doesn't the KDE styleguide say that all applications showing a systray icon should minimise upon clicking on the X button in the main window? If that is so, this is a bug, not a wish.
Comment 4 Stephan Kulow 2003-10-31 19:05:42 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 63480 ***