Bug 66811 - KHTML does not render tables wide enough when it finds width attributes in the table's td tags [testcase] [regression]
Summary: KHTML does not render tables wide enough when it finds width attributes in th...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 64079
Alias: None
Product: konqueror
Classification: Applications
Component: khtml renderer (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Compiled Sources Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Konqueror Developers
URL:
Keywords:
: 52963 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-10-29 04:16 UTC by djoham
Modified: 2004-01-21 14:54 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments
testcase (209 bytes, text/html)
2003-10-29 04:17 UTC, djoham
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description djoham 2003-10-29 04:16:23 UTC
Version:            (using KDE Devel)
Installed from:    Compiled sources
OS:          Linux

Hello all,

I've noticed when using Yahoo mail and Konq 3.2 from CVS that the logout link is not lined up as expected on the right side of the content area like it is in Konq 3.1x and Mozilla. I've broken down the HTML page to a couple of lines that show the problem and I will attach it to this bug report. 


It seems as though when Konq 3.1x and Mozilla encounter any td that has a width attribute inside a table, they make the parent table of the td tag have a width of 100%. 

While Konq 3.1x demonstrated this behavior, Konq 3.2 does not. If you look at the testcase, you'll see that Konq 3.2 makes the table only as wide as it needs to to contain the content. Compare that to Mozilla or Konq 3.1x where the table is basically the width of the screen and you can see the issue.

I have included a little extra text in the test case that says "I should be in a very wide cell and aligned to the right". This text simulates where the Yahoo Mail logout text and link goes. It's not really part of the testcase, but it does demonstrate the use case that caused this bug to be found.

Thanks for your attention,

David
Comment 1 djoham 2003-10-29 04:17:45 UTC
Created attachment 2923 [details]
testcase
Comment 2 Stephan Kulow 2003-10-31 23:39:59 UTC
I think, that's a standard regression.
Comment 3 Stephan Kulow 2004-01-11 18:08:49 UTC
*** Bug 52963 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Stephan Kulow 2004-01-21 14:54:47 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 64079 ***