Bug 63135 - Wish for a better handling of CTAGS
Summary: Wish for a better handling of CTAGS
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: kdevelop
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0.0a5
Platform: Gentoo Packages Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: KDevelop Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-08-22 21:30 UTC by Jay
Modified: 2003-09-17 16:14 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jay 2003-08-22 21:30:25 UTC
Version:           3.0.0a5 (using KDE 3.1.3)
Installed from:    Gentoo
Compiler:          gcc version 3.2.3 20030422 (Gentoo Linux 1.4 3.2.3-r1, propolice)
OS:          Linux (i686) release 2.4.20-gentoo-r5

when i choose ctags from the tools menu, a dialog opens asking me if i want to generate a ctags database, i choose yes and nothing happens. no output to console by gideon. CTAGS version is 5.5 from 
http://ctags.sourceforge.net
gideon is from CVS a few days old.
gentoo linux 1.4
Comment 1 Jens Dagerbo 2003-08-23 03:18:04 UTC
 
Is ctags installed via portage? If so, you'll find that gentoo installs the binary as 
"exuberant-ctags" in order to not conflict with a different "ctags" binary (part of 
emacs, IIRC). An obvious workaround, if you don't already have /usr/bin/ctags is 
to create a symlink to /usr/bin/exuberant-ctags. (This is what I did.) 
 
In either case, this is at least bad behaviour on the part of Gideon. The ctags 
binary name apparently needs to be configurable, and it shouldn't fail without 
feedback. (Already in a todo somewhere..) 
 
Comment 2 Jay 2003-08-23 03:58:42 UTC
Subject: Re:  ctags not working in customproject

Great, now it works. Thanks!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/Rsos9+37qIEeCRARAk+NAKCJMI+sBD4bZJyUOFVEEY1smYgP0gCfbUve
GyVSMZXgbcXcF7fn6Qhc+Gk=
=GwuF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Comment 3 Jens Dagerbo 2003-08-24 02:59:53 UTC
I'm changing this to "wishlist", as in "Wish for a better handling of CTAGS". :) 
 
 
Comment 4 Amilcar do Carmo Lucas 2003-08-25 19:08:13 UTC
This seams to be related to: 
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40053 
Comment 5 Jens Dagerbo 2003-09-17 16:14:15 UTC
Gideon now notifies the user about a failure to create the tags file and informs about 
the necessary binary name - 'ctags'. 
 
Good enough for now. Closing.