Bug 62520 - Need to use common SOCKS5 proxy server settings
Summary: Need to use common SOCKS5 proxy server settings
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: kopete
Classification: Applications
Component: libkopete (show other bugs)
Version: 0.40.0
Platform: Compiled Sources Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kopete Developers
URL:
Keywords:
: 57843 58274 68545 131348 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-08-12 05:04 UTC by Andrey Cherepanov
Modified: 2008-05-31 21:32 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andrey Cherepanov 2003-08-12 05:04:31 UTC
Version:           0.7.1 (using KDE 3.1.2)
Installed from:    compiled sources
Compiler:          gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-98)
OS:          Linux (i686) release 2.4.7-10

I need to use SOCKS5 proxy server for any connection to non-HTTP Internet (Jabber, ICQ, IRC). But only Jabber has appropriate setting. Why I can use IRC/ICQ? Run kopete through Dante has actuate segfault.
I guess, kopete must has separate tab or better profile for connection via proxy server. And each account record must has choice for use proxy connection or not.
Comment 1 Martijn Klingens 2003-08-12 10:32:28 UTC
*** Bug 58274 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Martijn Klingens 2003-08-12 10:32:41 UTC
*** Bug 57843 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Martijn Klingens 2003-08-12 10:34:54 UTC
Leaving this one in Bugzilla and not the (older) reports that I just marked as duplicate 
because this one is generic and the others are per-plugin. This should be solved mostly at 
the kdelibs level (i.e. it's almost unfixable for now), but the rest is libkopete's work, not the 
various plugins'. 
 
Martijn 
 
Comment 4 Till Gerken 2003-08-12 10:50:10 UTC
As long as we are using the various backend plugins I am not sure if this can be done in a 
generic way at all. They'd all have to be based on KExtendedSocket (or wherever the Proxy 
handling goes), can this be done with our code base? I know that it will be possible with 
Jabber once libxmpp has stabilized, the same goes probably for Oscar. What about Yahoo 
and Gadu-Gadu? 
Comment 5 Andrey Cherepanov 2003-08-12 10:55:01 UTC
I join to Till Gerken and want to use IRC and ICQ via SOCKS5! 
Comment 6 Martijn Klingens 2003-08-12 10:56:11 UTC
Implementation-wise, sure. But the config settings should move to libkopete just like they  
already did in 0.7.x for the password editbox in the account config.  
  
Martijn  
 
Comment 7 Till Gerken 2003-08-12 11:54:36 UTC
Alright, that makes sense. Something for the todo list for the next version. 
Comment 8 JPollak 2003-08-12 16:06:34 UTC
Although I didn't say so in bug 57843, I don't have a SOCKS5 proxy at work, I only 
have an HTTP proxy, which is how we currently get GAIM to connect out to the net. 
Does this bug include the standardization of non-SOCKS5 proxies as well? 
Comment 9 Thiago Macieira 2003-08-12 16:19:15 UTC
Non-SOCKS5 proxies won't be standardised before KDE 3.2. I'm working on the 
implementation, but don't get your hopes up. 
Comment 10 Thiago Macieira 2003-12-19 16:57:25 UTC
Just to let you know, I've got preliminary HTTP proxy support working for the KDE 3.3 framework.
Comment 11 Matt Rogers 2004-01-23 19:54:35 UTC
*** Bug 68545 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Giovanni Venturi 2004-11-16 13:16:44 UTC
I think kopete needs a proxy support to get more users use it.
Comment 13 Thiago Macieira 2004-11-16 15:55:55 UTC
Giovanni: we know it. But I don't have the time to write the code any time soon, even though the most part is already there. What is missing is the UI and the code to decide what proxy to use for which servers.

That's not a high priority and will probably not be implemented until KDE 4  (Kopete 1.0).
Comment 14 Andreas Kling 2006-07-25 15:04:58 UTC
*** Bug 131348 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Will Stephenson 2007-11-14 14:25:56 UTC
Using a common set of socket classes would be a start.
Comment 16 Nick Shaforostoff 2008-05-31 20:35:36 UTC
Should this bug be tagged as duplicate for #74832 ?
Comment 17 Thiago Macieira 2008-05-31 21:32:14 UTC
SOCKS5 and HTTP proxying are not the same.