Version: (using KDE KDE 3.0.99) Installed from: Compiled From Sources Compiler: gcc 3.2 OS: Linux Seems like the kspell docs in kdelibs don't want to compile. The kdex.dtd isn't found. I'll attach an output of the make run. I think I stumbled over this one already in RC3. I removed the doc line from the Makefile and it went on if I recall right. Regards, Malte
Created attachment 622 [details] Output of `make`
Subject: Re: New: kspell docs won't compile Am Sonntag, 15. Dezember 2002 20:53 schrieben Sie: > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. > > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51952 > Summary: kspell docs won't compile > Product: kdelibs > Version: unspecified > Platform: Compiled Sources > OS/Version: Linux > Status: UNCONFIRMED > Severity: normal > Priority: NOR > Component: general > AssignedTo: coolo@kde.org > ReportedBy: kde-contrib@msquadrat.de > > > Version: (using KDE KDE 3.0.99) > Installed from: Compiled From Sources > Compiler: gcc 3.2 > OS: Linux > > Seems like the kspell docs in kdelibs don't want to compile. The kdex.dtd > isn't found. I'll attach an output of the make run. > > I think I stumbled over this one already in RC3. I removed the doc line > from the Makefile and it went on if I recall right. This sounds very much like the usual "don't update your libxml" bug Greetings, Stephan
Eh... the what? I've got libxml 2.4.26. Is that one too old or too new (do you mean "don't" or "didn't")? Or do you mean #41374? I'll try the hack suggested there. If this is a known bug in RC5, it should IMHO go to "Known bugs" on [1]. Regards, Malte [1]http://www.kde.org/info/3.1.html
Subject: Re: kspell docs won't compile Am Montag, 16. Dezember 2002 09:26 schrieben Sie: > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. > > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51952 > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From kde-contrib@msquadrat.de 2002-12-16 09:26 > ------- Eh... the what? I've got libxml 2.4.26. Is that one too old or too > new (do you mean "don't" or "didn't")? > > Or do you mean #41374? I'll try the hack suggested there. If this is a > known bug in RC5, it should IMHO go to "Known bugs" on [1]. It's a bug in your libxml Greetings, Stephan
I think I finally found the bugs you're talking about [2,3]. Unfortunately does it seem like those bugs aren't fixed yet. I compiled the latest xmllib 2.4.30 which obviously contains the patch from [2]. Still the same error. The pages [4,5] read "For the KDE help system, you'll need to install libxml2, version 2.3.13 or newer." I think those pages should note that bug in libxml2 <= 2.4.26 (?). Especially because it looks like 3.1-final won't compile with those libs, too. Regards, Malte [2]http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99326 [3]http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96963 [4]http://developer.kde.org/build/compile_cvs.html [5]http://developer.kde.org/build/compile_kde3_0.html
Subject: Re: kspell docs won't compile Am Mittwoch, 18. Dezember 2002 21:21 schrieben Sie: > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. > > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51952 > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From kde-contrib@msquadrat.de 2002-12-18 21:21 > ------- I think I finally found the bugs you're talking about [2,3]. > Unfortunately does it seem like those bugs aren't fixed yet. I compiled the > latest xmllib 2.4.30 which obviously contains the patch from [2]. Still the > same error. > > The pages [4,5] read "For the KDE help system, you'll need to install > libxml2, version 2.3.13 or newer." I think those pages should note that bug > in libxml2 <= 2.4.26 (?). Especially because it looks like 3.1-final won't > compile with those libs, too. > > Regards, > Malte > > [2]http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99326 > [3]http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96963 > [4]http://developer.kde.org/build/compile_cvs.html > [5]http://developer.kde.org/build/compile_kde3_0.html Hmm, I do have libxml 2.4.30 and it works just as it Greetings, Stephan
I tried it now 3 times and I can't get it to compile. I had xmllib 2.4.28 installed (Gentoo) but compiled 2.4.30 and installed it into /usr/local. According to config.log exactly this version is used. Hmmm... `ldconfig -p | grep libxml2` gives libxml2.so.2 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 libxml2.so.2 (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2 libxml2.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/libxml2.so libxml2.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so Is this list searched top-down? But overriding libs this way always worked for me... puzzled, Malte
Subject: Re: kspell docs won't compile On Samstag, 21. Dezember 2002 23:27, you wrote: > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. > > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51952 > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From kde-contrib@msquadrat.de 2002-12-21 23:27 > ------- I tried it now 3 times and I can't get it to compile. > > I had xmllib 2.4.28 installed (Gentoo) but compiled 2.4.30 and installed it > into /usr/local. According to config.log exactly this version is used. > > Hmmm... `ldconfig -p | grep libxml2` gives > libxml2.so.2 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 > libxml2.so.2 (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2 > libxml2.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/libxml2.so > libxml2.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so > Is this list searched top-down? But overriding libs this way always worked > for me... > How about ldd on meinproc? Greetings, Stephan
| treehouse kdelibs-3.1rc5 # ldd kdoctools/.libs/meinproc | grep xml | libxml2.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2 (0x4110d000) It's linked against the locally compiled one, ie. 2.4.30. Regards, Malte P.S.: I don't want to abuse Bugzilla as my personal support forum. Should I take this request to the lists, if so which one?
Subject: Re: kspell docs won't compile On Sonntag, 22. Dezember 2002 18:17, you wrote: > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. > > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51952 > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From kde-contrib@msquadrat.de 2002-12-22 18:17 > ------- > > | treehouse kdelibs-3.1rc5 # ldd kdoctools/.libs/meinproc | grep xml > | libxml2.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2 (0x4110d000) > > It's linked against the locally compiled one, ie. 2.4.30. > > Regards, > Malte > > P.S.: I don't want to abuse Bugzilla as my personal support forum. Should I > take this request to the lists, if so which one? kde-devel Greetings, Stephan
I found a solution for this problem: I symlinked the dtd dir into the kspell dir and the needed dtd was found: | treehouse /usr/src/kde-3.1-rc5/kdelibs-3.1rc5/doc/kspell # ln -s | ../../kdoctools/customization/dtd | treehouse /usr/src/kde-3.1-rc5/kdelibs-3.1rc5/doc/kspell # make | KDELIBS_UNINSTALLED=yes ../../kdoctools/meinproc --check --cache | index.cache.bz2 ./index.docbook | treehouse /usr/src/kde-3.1-rc5/kdelibs-3.1rc5/doc/kspell # I'll reopen this bug as I think this is a bug either in the Makefile or meinproc. If you need any further infos, ask me. Regards, Malte
I just tried to compile Gideon on my SuSE 7.3 box and got the same error. Symlinked the dtd dir and everything went on smoothly. KDE 3.0.5 (SuSE RPMs from [6]) libxml2 2.4.23-52 (SuSE RPMs) Regards, Malte [6]ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/x11/kde/stable/3.0.5/SuSE/ix86/7.3
it's still a bug in your installation. Symlinking the directory is a work around
Hi Stephan, it was no bug in my installation but a typo in the index.docbook !DOCTYPE. The (trivial) patch can be found on kde-devel in [7]. Regards, Malte [7]200212271646.12564@malte.stretz.eu.org