Bug 380728 - PLEASE REDIRECT: Cannot compile version 0.5.6 under Arch
Summary: PLEASE REDIRECT: Cannot compile version 0.5.6 under Arch
Status: RESOLVED NOT A BUG
Alias: None
Product: rkward
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified All
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: RKWard Team
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-06-28 10:27 UTC by RKWard Team
Modified: 2011-08-01 10:44 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:

Attachments
-- Originally posted by (AT sourceforge.net): nobody -- Build output for version 0.5.6 (29.91 KB, text/plain)
2011-06-28 10:27 UTC, RKWard Team 		Details
View All Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description RKWard Team 2011-06-28 10:27:50 UTC 
-- Originally posted by (AT sourceforge.net): *anonymous --

-- This ticket was imported from http://sourceforge.net/p/rkward/bugs/91 on 2017-05-30 15:26:45 +0100 --
Version 0.5.5 is installed and works fine on my system. When upgrading with the AUR script, package building fails.
Tried building from source, got the same error. Dependencies seem to be ok. See attached file for build output.
Comment 1 RKWard Team 2011-06-28 10:27:54 UTC 
-- Originally posted by (AT sourceforge.net): nobody --
Build output for version 0.5.6
-- Created an attachment --
Comment 2 Thomas Friedrichsmeier 2011-06-28 14:29:25 UTC 
Hi\!

From the attached log it looks like the docbook dtd could not be found on your system. Please double-check that docbook-xsl / docbook-xml is installed.

Either way, we cannot address this problem in RKWard. Please redirect the matter to the maintainer of the AUR script:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rkward/PKGBUILD:
\# Maintainer: Nicky726 \(Nicky726 <at> gmail <dot> com\)

Regards
Thomas
Comment 3 Thomas Friedrichsmeier 2011-06-28 14:29:25 UTC 
- **summary**: Cannot compile version 0.5.6 under Arch --> PLEASE REDIRECT: Cannot compile version 0.5.6 under Arch
Comment 4 Thomas Friedrichsmeier 2011-08-01 10:44:59 UTC 
I hope the reporter has seen my comment. Definitely, the report was open for long enough after that.

Closing.
Comment 5 Thomas Friedrichsmeier 2011-08-01 10:44:59 UTC 
- **status**: open --> closed-invalid