Bug 380535 - RKWard 0.2.7: proposals
Summary: RKWard 0.2.7: proposals
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: rkward
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified All
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: RKWard Team
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-09-03 11:22 UTC by RKWard Team
Modified: 2004-09-03 12:04 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description RKWard Team 2004-09-03 11:22:57 UTC
-- Originally posted by (AT sourceforge.net): danielemedri --

-- This ticket was imported from http://sourceforge.net/p/rkward/feature-requests/1 on 2017-05-31 14:48:55 +0100 --

TERMS AND CONCEPTS 
On main window, I suggest to maintain the "File" entry 
instead of "Workspace". It's a classical form and, 
thinking on localization, could be usefull. In  
italian this could be translated in "Area di Lavoro" and 
isn't good. Other change is for the "Windows" menu that 
sould contain these entries: 

"Show R Console" 
"Show Output" 
"Show Workspace" 
"----------------------------" 
"Open Command Editor" 


LOCALIZATION PROCESS 
Create the rkward.po file in the po/ directory. 


OBJECTS BROWSER WINDOW  
There could be some confusion with the terms "Objects 
Browser" and "Workspace". I think that spin to 
"Workspace" could be a good concept because  
this classify "objects" in a working activity. 

The object browser window sould change: 
 - title: s/Objects in the R workspace/Workspace/ 
 - s/<R Workspace>/Objects/ 

Actually the "type" field value isn't shown. 

When things are going to stability, Everaldo \(or friends\) 
could help us to realize glad icons for every kind of object 
\(eg. icon for data.frame, icon for variables, ect.\) in the 
Crystal theme fashion. 


R CONSOLE 

Question: with the new command editor, what sould be 
the R Console windos? Many people/scientist use R in 
console and find usefull coding inside a terminal window. 
S-Plus erroneous was wrong about it in the past and we 
need  to avoid this way: a user-friendly interface is a 
"flexible" interface that could be easy but not stupid, that 
suggest a simple way to do things but offer "other" ways 
for geeks. 

IMHO, the R Console sould be a classical terminal 
window with R command line. A user will code inside this 
terminal with our loaded workspace and without any 
"Run" or "Reset" buttons. This capability port us to some 
problems: when a user run commands, we need a  
sub-layer that control what happen \(eg. removing an 
object in the workspace with "rm\(my.data\)" sould update 
the "Workspace" window \(ex-Objects Browser\)  
and close the data.frame window in Main\). This kind of 
control is a must. 

An expert-user without classical R console could open 
rkward and an external xterm+R console to work on the 
same workspace. RKWard need to lock activities  
on the workspace area and address the use of rkward::R 
console instead. 

Schema: 
 rkward -> load workspace and lock activities on it 
 rkward-RConsole -> any code will be passed to a control 
layer. -- Labels: Interface Improvements (example) --
Comment 1 Thomas Friedrichsmeier 2004-09-03 12:04:34 UTC
Logged In: YES 
user\_id=300591

Request has been split up into separate items. 
Comment 2 Thomas Friedrichsmeier 2004-09-03 12:04:34 UTC
- **status**: open --> closed