Bug 363298 - Allow users to define custom stamp to use with the review functions.
Summary: Allow users to define custom stamp to use with the review functions.
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: okular
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Okular developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-05-19 20:51 UTC by José Tomás Atria
Modified: 2017-08-17 23:05 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description José Tomás Atria 2016-05-19 20:51:20 UTC
Please allow a user to define custom images to be used as stamps in the review features of Okular.



Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Burkhard Lück 2016-05-22 08:14:24 UTC
please read https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127974/diff/1#index_header
how to define custom stamps
Comment 3 Robert Cabane 2016-05-28 13:25:44 UTC
Additionally, the provided stamps :
CONFIDENTIAL, Approved, Not Approved, Draft, Experimental, As Is, Expired, Final, For Comment, For Public Release, Sold, Top Secret, Departmental
got their descriptive texts translated, while the stamp's image remains in pure English.
How could we localize such things ? (perhaps crafting the required images by means of a Graphics Magic  call ?).
Comment 4 Robert Cabane 2016-11-19 19:36:07 UTC
As of Okular 0.24, it's really possible to create personal stamps, see here :
https://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/Okular/
However, the exported PDF file doesn't show the personal stamps with any other viewer as Okular (tested with Evince and the pdf viewers included in FireFox or Chrome).
Comment 5 Nate Graham 2017-08-17 23:05:00 UTC
This feature already exists, but it's just got a few issues:

1. It's not very discoverable. That's tracked by https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383652
2. Stamps are saved into the document in a way that other viewers don't see it. That's tracked by https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383651