Bug 281114 - Aniversaries are duplicate in korganizer when both partners exist in the addressbook.
Summary: Aniversaries are duplicate in korganizer when both partners exist in the addr...
Status: REPORTED
Alias: None
Product: korganizer
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: 4.7
Platform: Ubuntu Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kdepim bugs
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-08-31 13:49 UTC by Jonathan Kolberg
Modified: 2022-10-27 16:59 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:

Attachments
Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jonathan Kolberg 2011-08-31 13:49:07 UTC 
Version:           4.7 (using KDE 4.7.0) 
OS:                Linux

This is a forwarded bug reported by Luis Silva. The original url is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdepim/+bug/420680

Reproducible: Didn't try

Steps to Reproduce:
Create contact A in kaddressbook.
Create contact B in kaddressbook.
Mark contact B as a partner of contact A and set an aniversary date in A's details.
Mark contact A as a partner of contact B and set an aniversary date in B's details.

Actual Results:  
What you get is two entries in korganizer:
A & B's anniversary
B & A's anniversary

Expected Results:  
Only one entry should show up
Comment 1 Jonathan Kolberg 2016-08-26 09:09:53 UTC 
This is still the case with latest git build
Comment 2 Justin Zobel 2022-10-24 00:46:45 UTC 
Thank you for reporting this bug in KDE software. As it has been a while since this issue was reported, can we please ask you to see if you can reproduce the issue with a recent software version?

If you can reproduce the issue, please change the status to "REPORTED" when replying. Thank you!
Comment 3 Jonathan Kolberg 2022-10-27 16:59:51 UTC 
As far as I can see the feature to mark a person as a partner of another in your contacts is gone. If you just type in the name in the input field for partner it still happens. So I'm not sure if we should still count that as a bug, or if the feature of marking as partner was discontinued.