Bug 263587 - BCC addresses shows bcc's to "To:" recipient
Summary: BCC addresses shows bcc's to "To:" recipient
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: kmail2
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: 2.0.89
Platform: openSUSE Linux
: VHI normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kdepim bugs
URL:
Keywords:
: 275154 278014 282536 284812 285312 285345 289339 289732 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-01-18 23:13 UTC by ferahgo.de
Modified: 2011-12-26 05:02 UTC (History)
17 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In: 4.8.0


Attachments
snapshot of the bug (58.92 KB, image/png)
2011-01-21 02:15 UTC, Antonis Tsiapaliokas
Details
patch to remove BCC from mail befor sent out (53.24 KB, patch)
2011-11-07 20:42 UTC, Peter Pille
Details
patch to remove BCC from mail befor sent out (696 bytes, patch)
2011-11-14 08:04 UTC, Peter Pille
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description ferahgo.de 2011-01-18 23:13:10 UTC
Version:           2.0.89 (using KDE 4.5.95) 
OS:                Linux

I just sent a mail round to some of my friends, one in To: field, the other two in BCC: field. And one of the latter complained that the To: guy could see him. This time it's not extremely bad but I now must stick a post-it to my laptop saying "never write bcc mails in kmail2" ;)
I retried by sending sth. round to my junk addresses and indeed it happens everytime. GMail web interface shows it as such - in the inbox, not the sent mail:
"to X, bcc: Y, bcc: Z"

You sure agree that this is not cool? (Btw.: Actual sending works, everyone gets the mail.)

Let me know if you need any more hints to whatsoever.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1) Click "New Message"
2) Fill in the forms, enter an address in "To:", another one in "BCC:"
3) Type a subject and a body
4) Send the mail
5) Feel astonished about how BCC shows up to everyone..

Actual Results:  
Well BCC should by all means not show...
I searched the forums, nothing showed, plus I shuffled through the options - nothing that would help..

Expected Results:  
Show the To:-recipient only his/her contact data but not BCC please!

OS: Linux (x86_64) release 2.6.37-rc7-desktop
Compiler: gcc
Comment 1 Torgny Nyblom 2011-01-19 11:18:53 UTC
I cannot reproduce this using kmail-4.6.40.git.1295365191-1.1.
Please reopen if you can reproduce using a later version.
Comment 2 ferahgo.de 2011-01-20 20:31:47 UTC
4.6.40.git.1295453417-1.1 - retried. Still shows up. Are you by any chance using a gmail-account? Maybe it's something related to their SMTP server?
Comment 3 Antonis Tsiapaliokas 2011-01-21 02:15:53 UTC
Created attachment 56265 [details]
snapshot of the bug

I cannot reproduce this bug... I am using gmail... Here is some information about my kde enviroment

kde-devel@kokeroulis-desktop:~> kmail -v
Qt: 4.7.1
KDE Development Platform: 4.6.41 (4.7 >= 20110106)
KMail: 2.0.89

And here is a snapshot...
Comment 4 ferahgo.de 2011-01-21 10:28:03 UTC
But there you go, that's what I mean. You CAN see the BCC: line in your mail. And when I send messages from the webclient of my university-mail I cannot - which is the way it should be! CC of course is to be shown to the others, but not BCC, see here, quoted from [1]: 
=== Visibility===

[..] the recipient of an email can see any email address specified by the Sender in the To: or Cc: fields. If on the other hand the Sender has specified addresses in the Bcc: field, the recipient in this case cannot see these Bcc addresses. [...]The "BCC:" field (where the "BCC" means "Blind Carbon Copy") contains addresses of recipients of the message whose addresses are not to be revealed to other recipients of the message.

____
[1]= https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Blind_carbon_copy#Visibility
Comment 5 ferahgo.de 2011-01-21 10:50:50 UTC
Compare: [1] vs. [2] 
Here, both mails come from the uranus.uni-freiburg.de -address and are sent To: ferahgo[xx]@gmail.com and BCC'd to the mo.[xx]@gmail.com address. 1 is the result by kmail, 2 by the web interface.
__
[1] http://www.abload.de/img/snapshot1htlk.png
[2] http://www.abload.de/img/snapshot2poq9.png
Comment 6 Torgny Nyblom 2011-01-21 15:04:16 UTC
Well I cannot reproduce this bug using my day or so old version of kmail/kde.

I'm using postfix as my mail server.

Could you attach the actual mail that has the Bcc: Header shown here as an mbox file?
Comment 7 ferahgo.de 2011-01-22 11:28:40 UTC
see here:
http://db.tt/Els1lSC (kmail) and http://db.tt/QhtVkeZ (web interface). I altered the files insofar as I've greyed out my mail adresses - sorry if that is a problem, I just have my little worries about having them online "sort of" publicly.

From my naive point of view the web interface does it as follows: It deletes the BCC: line completely from the header while sending but sends it there nonetheless - which kmail seems to handle differently. However it's maybe a simple way around: use postfix as this seems to work for you, but still..
Comment 8 Torgny Nyblom 2011-01-22 15:18:38 UTC
What sort of transport are you using for sending (SMTP/Sendmail)?
Comment 9 ferahgo.de 2011-01-22 18:56:37 UTC
SMTP:)
Comment 10 Torgny Nyblom 2011-01-23 06:12:38 UTC
Damn, there goes one theory
Comment 11 Torgny Nyblom 2011-02-23 11:00:32 UTC
I'm sorry but I cannot reproduce this or find any potential issues in the code.
Until I (or someone else) can reproduce I'm afraid fixing will be next to impossible.

One final question: could you post a wireshark dump of the message sending between your computer and your SMTP server?
Comment 12 ferahgo.de 2011-02-23 16:47:48 UTC
http://db.tt/vqlCbwO

I hope this does it? I've never done that before so I'm not too sure about it. Beware, it's a txt of ~700 KiB ..
Comment 13 RSB 2011-07-03 10:25:51 UTC
I can reproduce this bug. If I send emails with bcc the received email contains a field bbc in the header with all email addresses.
This bug is still present in kmail 2.1.0. Any news to this topic? How can I help?
Comment 14 Christophe Marin 2011-07-18 17:30:42 UTC
*** Bug 278014 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Andreas Cord-Landwehr 2011-07-21 15:36:35 UTC
Hi, just tested with kdepim 4.6.1, unfortunately I can still reproduce this bug (my original report was: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=278014). The message source of a message as received by the To-receiver looks as follows:

-------------------------

Return-Path: <phoenixx@uni-paderborn.de>
Received: from mail.uni-paderborn.de (spheron.uni-paderborn.de [131.234.200.49])
	 by mail.uni-paderborn.de (Cyrus v2.3.16-Debian-2.3.16-4) with LMTPA;
	 Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:06:08 +0200
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3
Received: from worblehat.cs.uni-paderborn.de ([131.234.65.71] helo=worblehat.localnet)
	by mail.uni-paderborn.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.72 spheron)
	id 1Qjsx4-0000t0-Io; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:06:07 +0200
From: Andreas Cord-Landwehr <phoenixx@uni-paderborn.de>
To: cola@upb.de
Bcc: cordlandwehr@googlemail.com
Subject: bcc test
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:06:05 +0200
Message-ID: <1866644.upYXcEeu6t@worblehat>
User-Agent: KMail/4.6.1 (Linux/2.6.39-2-686-pae; KDE/4.6.5; i686; git-8bc3fea; 2011-07-16)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-IMT-Spam-Score: 0.0 ()
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2011.7.21.125715
X-IMT-Authenticated-Sender: uid=phoenixx,ou=People,o=upb,c=de
Comment 16 Christophe Marin 2011-07-21 16:20:37 UTC
Andreas, can you try the same test but with the gmail smtp server instead.
Comment 17 Andreas Cord-Landwehr 2011-07-21 16:31:14 UTC
Return-Path: <cordlandwehr@googlemail.com>
Received: from worblehat.localnet (worblehat.cs.uni-paderborn.de [131.234.65.71])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s10sm1488206fah.46.2011.07.21.09.28.58
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
Apparently it is not Cyrus-mail's fault ;) Here the mail, I received at the To-Receiver at the google-account:

-------------------------------------

From: Andreas Cord-Landwehr <cordlandwehr@googlemail.com>
To: cordlandwehr@googlemail.com
Bcc: cola@upb.de
Subject: BCC 5
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:28:57 +0200
Message-ID: <100868973.f3VFht6u6I@worblehat>
User-Agent: KMail/4.6.1 (Linux/2.6.39-2-686-pae; KDE/4.6.5; i686; git-8bc3fea; 2011-07-16)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Comment 18 Andreas Cord-Landwehr 2011-07-21 16:32:54 UTC
Sorry, here with a clean mail-source:

------------------

Return-Path: <cordlandwehr@googlemail.com>
Received: from worblehat.localnet (worblehat.cs.uni-paderborn.de [131.234.65.71])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s10sm1488206fah.46.2011.07.21.09.28.58
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andreas Cord-Landwehr <cordlandwehr@googlemail.com>
To: cordlandwehr@googlemail.com
Bcc: cola@upb.de
Subject: BCC 5
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:28:57 +0200
Message-ID: <100868973.f3VFht6u6I@worblehat>
User-Agent: KMail/4.6.1 (Linux/2.6.39-2-686-pae; KDE/4.6.5; i686; git-8bc3fea; 2011-07-16)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Comment 19 Christophe Marin 2011-07-21 17:53:09 UTC
Tried different accounts, different settings (signed/unsigned, with/without attachment, plain/html different charsets..)

Still unable to reproduce.

no clue if you look at the message in your sent folder ?
Comment 20 Andreas Cord-Landwehr 2011-07-22 07:47:42 UTC
Hi, I wrote a mail with Idedove for comparison. Here is what I received at the
To-receiver (the Bcc-receiver is stripped correctly). Would it help to make any
kind of traces?

-------------------------------

Delivered-To: cordlandwehr@googlemail.com
Received: by 10.68.62.36 with SMTP id v4cs13861pbr;
        Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.36.89 with SMTP id s25mr1701017fad.9.1311320514615;
        Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <phoenixx@uni-paderborn.de>
Received: from mail.uni-paderborn.de (mail.uni-paderborn.de [131.234.142.9])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d8si3505412fak.171.2011.07.22.00.41.54
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of
phoenixx@uni-paderborn.de designates 131.234.142.9 as permitted sender)
client-ip=131.234.142.9;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record
for domain of phoenixx@uni-paderborn.de designates 131.234.142.9 as permitted
sender) smtp.mail=phoenixx@uni-paderborn.de
Received: from kaffee.uni-paderborn.de ([131.234.11.196])
    by mail.uni-paderborn.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
    (Exim 4.72 spheron)
    id 1QkAMq-0007AX-IO; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:41:53 +0200
Message-ID: <4E2929BF.4030103@uni-paderborn.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:41:51 +0200
From: Andreas Cord-Landwehr <phoenixx@uni-paderborn.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110704
Lightning/1.0b1 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cordlandwehr@googlemail.com
Subject: BCC TEST 7
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IMT-Spam-Score: 0.0 ()
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data:
2011.7.22.73016
X-IMT-Authenticated-Sender: uid=phoenixx,ou=People,o=upb,c=de

TB generated mail
Comment 21 Torgny Nyblom 2011-07-26 18:57:09 UTC
All information about transport type and settings (not actual usernames or servers, but what boxes are ticked and what fields are used and so).

That way the code path should be possible to find and reproducing should be easier.
Comment 22 Andreas Cord-Landwehr 2011-08-31 14:49:29 UTC
Hi, after a lot of research an testing with different mail servers (where I could reproduce the bug only on some of them), I am quite sure that we hit the Exim-Bug from which also MUTT suffers: http://linuxgazette.net/182/brownss.html

My tests resulted in:
* reproduceable with Cyrus mailserver
* non-reproduceable with Postfix
* reproduceable with Googlemail (no idea what they are using)

I hope this helps.
Comment 23 Christophe Marin 2011-08-31 16:39:44 UTC
ok reproduced with two gmail accounts and a gmx one after reading this (in french) http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/gmail/thread?tid=60c332bcebb449b1&hl=fr

basically:
from @gmx address
to/cc remains empty
bcc gmail account 1 
bcc gmail account 2

on both gmail accounts, the two bcc recipients appear
Comment 24 Christophe Marin 2011-08-31 16:49:38 UTC
...and everything works as expected with non gmail addresses. I think we should close it with upstream
Comment 25 Andreas Cord-Landwehr 2011-09-01 06:43:41 UTC
I don't think so. At least with one of my university mailservers (running Cyrus mailserver software) this problem is also present. And contrary, the Bug is not present with KMail 1. So it is a regression that should be fixed imho.
Comment 26 John King 2011-09-16 16:05:48 UTC
This bug is still present in 4.7.1

System
New installation of opensuse 11.4, updated to KDE 4.7.1

When I send emails to a single To: recipient with BCC to several other recipients (not all gmail accounts), the To: recipient can see the BCC addresses.

I have tested this with gmail smtp (smtp.gmail.com) and demon smtp (post.demon.co.uk), with the same result.

If I send the email via Yahoo smtp (smtp.mail.yahoo.co.uk) the To: recipient does not see the BCC addresses.

The bug is marked as WAITINGFORINFO.  What info is required?
Comment 27 John King 2011-09-19 16:16:40 UTC
(In reply to comment #24)
> ...and everything works as expected with non gmail addresses. I think we should
> close it with upstream

I've now tested it with 1&1 smtp server and Demon (UK) smtp server as well as Gmail, sending in each case to non-gmail addresses.  In all cases the To: recipient can see the BCC addresses, and in some cases the BCC recipients can see all the BCC addresses. This did not happen with Kmail1.

This behaviour could give us some problems as most people on our membership lists specifically request to be sent BCC as they do not want their email addresses to be open to everybody.

Is there any information I can provide that could help nail the bug?
Comment 28 Christophe Marin 2011-09-22 10:26:16 UTC
*** Bug 282536 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 29 Christophe Marin 2011-09-22 10:27:13 UTC
Note: Bug 282536 contains a wireshark log
Comment 30 Christophe Marin 2011-10-30 15:27:27 UTC
*** Bug 284812 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 31 Christophe Marin 2011-10-30 15:27:36 UTC
*** Bug 285312 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 32 Christophe Marin 2011-10-30 15:27:44 UTC
*** Bug 275154 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 33 Christophe Marin 2011-10-30 20:30:45 UTC
*** Bug 285345 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 34 Christophe Marin 2011-10-30 20:31:24 UTC
reopen
Comment 35 Jens Lang 2011-11-04 21:54:44 UTC
The same for KMail in Ubuntu 11.10: The BCC is visible to everyone.
Comment 36 Franz Trischberger 2011-11-05 17:06:21 UTC
Same for me.
Sending with web.de works (not BCC visible for recipients, only for the sending account, if it is within the bcc list)
Sending with mail.zeus02.de (UD Media) discloses all BCCs.
Sending with googlemail discloses all BCCs.
Sending done solely with kmail2.

Installed is full kde.4.7.2 (including bundled kontact/kmail).
Also tested it with full kde-4.7.3, where googlemail discloses BCCs and web.de does not.
Comment 37 Peter Pille 2011-11-07 20:42:56 UTC
Created attachment 65366 [details]
patch to remove BCC from mail befor sent out

this patch removes the BCC recipients from the message in function Message::ComposerViewBase::fillQueueJobHeaders after they have been transferred to the send job.
Disadvantage is, that you don't see the BCC recipients anymore in the message copied to the sent folder.
Comment 38 J Appel 2011-11-10 10:38:06 UTC
the bug is present in the 4.7.3 release. 

I d very much prefer Peters patch with not being able to see the BCC recipients in the sent folder than showing it to everyone.
Comment 39 Peter Pille 2011-11-14 08:04:58 UTC
Created attachment 65642 [details]
patch to remove BCC from mail befor sent out

using the diff tool to create the patch according to the KDE conventions this time.
Comment 40 Peter Pille 2011-11-14 08:10:29 UTC
The attached patch applies to the file kdepim/messagecomposer/composerviewbase.cpp
Comment 41 Sven Klomp 2011-11-14 22:05:53 UTC
I'm also suffering of this bug.
I'm using the smtp server by www.df.eu

Interestingly, it works as expected if I'm sending the mail not directly to persons but to mailing lists (e.g. kdepim mailing list).
Comment 42 Peter Pille 2011-11-17 13:10:17 UTC
Interesting Sven, I had the problem also with using mailing lists. That's actually how I got aware of this bug.
Comment 43 Sven Klomp 2011-11-19 10:24:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #42)
> Interesting Sven, I had the problem also with using mailing lists. That's
> actually how I got aware of this bug.

I tried the kdepim mailing list, and no BCC were visible. (Mail from 11.11.11, however, the archive is not up to date).
Comment 44 Peter Pille 2011-11-19 11:15:02 UTC
Hi Sven,

the reason might be, that I'm using googlemail directly via IMAP and are not 
using any smtp server on my machine.

Peter

Am Samstag, 19. November 2011, 10:25:00 schrieb Sven Klomp:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263587
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Comment #43 from Sven Klomp <mail klomp eu>  2011-11-19 10:24:59 ---
> (In reply to comment #42)
> 
> > Interesting Sven, I had the problem also with using mailing lists.
> > That's
> > actually how I got aware of this bug.
> 
> I tried the kdepim mailing list, and no BCC were visible. (Mail from
> 11.11.11, however, the archive is not up to date).
Comment 45 Manolete 2011-11-23 21:55:03 UTC
I confirm too it's present in 4.7.3 with servers mail.gmx.com and smtp.googlemail.com.
Any possibility of having this really disturbing bug solved for 4.7.4?

Regards
Comment 46 Unknown 2011-11-24 08:26:27 UTC
This bug is definitely present in KMail 4.7.3.

Try add multiple BCC-s. KMail will separate them with comma and GMail will show all of them next to the recipient.
Comment 47 Peter Pille 2011-11-24 09:31:40 UTC
I attached a patch here recently, but got no reply of any developer so far. Does anybode know how to contact them directly?
Comment 48 Manolete 2011-11-24 18:00:47 UTC
Peter you can try http://pim.planetkde.org/ perhaps also forum.kde.org, but I think the most direct way is writing to the authors; their email addresses are listed in Kmail, menu Help/About Kmail/Authors (or something like that, my Kmail is in spanish)
Comment 49 Torgny Nyblom 2011-11-24 18:13:02 UTC
For patches please use git.reviewboard.kde.org instead of bugzilla.
The noise level of bugzilla simply hides the patches so no one notices them.
Comment 50 Torgny Nyblom 2011-12-02 08:50:50 UTC
Git commit 0875ca055322fd94962ed473be0a41854e17373a by Torgny Nyblom.
Committed on 02/12/2011 at 09:43.
Pushed by tnyblom into branch 'master'.

Make sure that the Bcc header is removed

When sending a mail make sure that the Bcc header is removed before
sending the mail.

CCBUG: 263587
REVIEW: 103308

M  +4    -0    agents/maildispatcher/sendjob.cpp

http://commits.kde.org/kdepim-runtime/0875ca055322fd94962ed473be0a41854e17373a
Comment 51 Torgny Nyblom 2011-12-02 08:55:04 UTC
Git commit 468b955ec785d8dca94ae00aa982d6d1b0a86410 by Torgny Nyblom.
Committed on 02/12/2011 at 09:43.
Pushed by tnyblom into branch 'KDE/4.7'.

Make sure that the Bcc header is removed

When sending a mail make sure that the Bcc header is removed before
sending the mail.

CCBUG: 263587
REVIEW: 103308
(cherry picked from commit 0875ca055322fd94962ed473be0a41854e17373a)

M  +4    -0    agents/maildispatcher/sendjob.cpp

http://commits.kde.org/kdepim-runtime/468b955ec785d8dca94ae00aa982d6d1b0a86410
Comment 52 Christophe Marin 2011-12-25 13:18:39 UTC
*** Bug 289732 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 53 Christophe Marin 2011-12-25 13:20:46 UTC
*** Bug 289339 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 54 J Appel 2011-12-25 14:06:56 UTC
with 4.7.4. the bug is still present for me.
Comment 55 Torgny Nyblom 2011-12-25 14:35:27 UTC
The above commit was too late for the 4.7.4 official release so distrobutions need to include it manually.