Bug 211685 - 2.1 -2.2: different behaviour of event Amarok.Engine.trackFinished
Summary: 2.1 -2.2: different behaviour of event Amarok.Engine.trackFinished
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: amarok
Classification: Applications
Component: Tools/Script Manager (show other bugs)
Version: 2.3-GIT
Platform: Ubuntu Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Amarok Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-10-24 19:43 UTC by Rico Zienke
Modified: 2010-05-02 12:17 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:

Attachments
Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Rico Zienke 2009-10-24 19:43:51 UTC 
Hi,
in amarok 2.1 the amarok event Amarok.Engine.trackFinished calls my function after the end of each track in the play list (like the name said).
Today I tried amarok-nightly, here only after the end of the play list my function will be called.

I just need the point at end of the play list for my needs, but would prefer to have a stable behaviour. Could you have a look please? 
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards Rico

PS: Script can be downloaded here:
http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=114274&vote=good&tan=85693468&PHPSESSID=6a7d094101f59512f6d8f7315f9bcfcb
Comment 1 Bill Klobas 2009-10-27 00:29:48 UTC 
Created attachment 37891


test1
Comment 2 Bill Klobas 2009-10-27 00:30:26 UTC 
Created attachment 37892


test2
Comment 3 Bill Klobas 2009-10-27 00:30:59 UTC 
Created attachment 37893


test3
Comment 4 Rico Zienke 2010-01-10 15:56:26 UTC 
i close no reaction and I'm living now with 2.2 behaviour
Comment 5 Myriam Schweingruber 2010-01-10 16:34:09 UTC 
Please close this correctly if you decide so. Amarok is by no means unmaintained.
Comment 6 Rico Zienke 2010-01-10 16:57:08 UTC 
(In reply to comment #5)
> Amarok is by no means unmaintained.
I do not understand this.

I think my bug was not invalid otherwise I would mark it as invalid.
There was no response and the new behaviour seems to be stable. The amarok releases are faster then this report belonging to one special release, that no one takes care. So I guess unmaintained fits more then invalid.
Comment 7 Myriam Schweingruber 2010-01-10 22:02:43 UTC 
which is pure rubbish, just because nobody answered your report Amarok is not unmaintained. But I think it is pointless to change this back and forth *sigh*.
Comment 8 Myriam Schweingruber 2010-05-02 12:17:20 UTC 
Changing status, according to this forum post: http://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=117&t=83115#p156336