Bug 171999 - Todo List sorts alphabetical
Summary: Todo List sorts alphabetical
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: korganizer
Classification: Applications
Component: todoview (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: openSUSE Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kdepim bugs
URL:
Keywords:
: 174465 177885 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-10-02 00:40 UTC by Michael Tils
Modified: 2008-12-16 07:57 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:

Attachments
Untested! patch to provide correct sorting of dates (545 bytes, patch)
2008-11-14 08:18 UTC, Thomas Thrainer 		Details
View All Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michael Tils 2008-10-02 00:40:28 UTC 
Version:           4.1.0 (using KDE 4.1.1)
OS:                Linux
Installed from:    SuSE RPMs

Hello,

if I sort the todo lost alphabetical it is sorted alphabetical.
Here in germany the date is written with day month year.
So my list is sorted by the day (01.10. .. 01.11 .. 02.10.) which is wrong.
In the kontact today summary it is sorted correct.

Bye and Greetings
Michael
Comment 1 Thomas Thrainer 2008-11-14 08:18:44 UTC 
Created attachment 28565 [details]
Untested! patch to provide correct sorting of dates

Unfortunately, I currently can't test the patch myself (broken setup), but it compiles at last.
It would be great if somebody is willing to integrate/test. Special care should be taken if sorting of priority-, recurs-, percent complete- and categories-column still works as expected (best with "Put completed todos at the bottom" turned off).

Sorry for the untested patches, but I thought better than nothing as I currently really don't have the time to fix my building/testing environment.
Comment 2 Allen Winter 2008-11-14 15:04:29 UTC 
SVN commit 884266 by winterz:

patch from Thomas to fix sorting.
BUG: 171999


 M  +1 -0      kotodoview.cpp  


WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=884266
Comment 3 Allen Winter 2008-11-14 15:06:26 UTC 
*** Bug 174465 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Thomas Thrainer 2008-12-16 07:57:53 UTC 
*** Bug 177885 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***