Bug 170611 - slideshow: ordering by exif date not correct
Summary: slideshow: ordering by exif date not correct
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: digikam
Classification: Applications
Component: Plugin-Generic-SlideShow (show other bugs)
Version: 0.9.3
Platform: Ubuntu Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Digikam Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-09-07 14:24 UTC by stephan
Modified: 2016-07-15 20:51 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In: 5.1.0


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description stephan 2008-09-07 14:24:05 UTC
Version:           0.9.3 (using KDE 4.1.0)
OS:                Linux
Installed from:    Ubuntu Packages

some pictures where an exif date has been added with jhead are not ordered correctly. they are displayed at the end of the slideshow.
Comment 1 caulier.gilles 2008-09-07 19:07:11 UTC
Are you using opengl slideshow (which provide a settings dialog) ?

Gilles Caulier
Comment 2 stephan 2008-09-07 21:18:20 UTC
i'm using the slideshow of digikam - don't know if this is opengl. are there any settings that i have to set?

regards,
stephan
Comment 3 caulier.gilles 2008-09-07 21:22:56 UTC
There are 2 Slideshow tools

- one without any effect (F9)
- one as kipi-plugins which provide a settings dialog. It provide opengl effect

Gilles
Comment 4 stephan 2008-09-07 22:25:32 UTC
ah, now i see. but both slideshows are sorted according to the folder view? 
for the order of the slideshow it makes no difference. so maybe I should correct my initial problem: pictures are generally not ordered correctly by exif date.

regards,
stephan
Comment 5 Andi Clemens 2010-09-25 17:43:21 UTC
Closing some old bugreports that are related to old digiKam version, and that have not received answers for two years now.

If you think the reports are still valid, feel free to re-open them, but please provide updates and do not just open them without giving feedback.
Comment 6 caulier.gilles 2015-07-04 06:04:31 UTC
New digiKam 4.11.0 is available.

https://www.digikam.org/node/740

Can you reproduce the problem with this release ?
Comment 7 caulier.gilles 2016-07-15 20:51:53 UTC
With digiKam 5.0.0, this problem is not reproducible.
I close this file now. Don't hesitate to re-open if necessary.
Gilles Caulier