Bug 166232 - Invisible widgets on the desktop
Summary: Invisible widgets on the desktop
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: plasma4
Classification: Unmaintained
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Compiled Sources Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Plasma Bugs List
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-07-10 15:19 UTC by Christophe Marin
Modified: 2008-07-11 01:13 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:

Attachments
plasma-appletsrc (3.19 KB, application/octet-stream)
2008-07-10 15:19 UTC, Christophe Marin 		Details
View All Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Christophe Marin 2008-07-10 15:19:32 UTC 
Version:           0.1 (using Devel)
Installed from:    Compiled sources
Compiler:          gcc-4.3
OS:                Linux (i686) release 2.6.25-2-486

kdebase/kdeplasma-addons rev. 830395

It seems the transform parameter in plasma-appletsrc make some widgets invisible. With the following plasma-appletsrc, ktorrent / embed-win / one of the two folderview / previewer / launcher are invisible.

While removing the zvalue didn't have any effect, deleting the 'transform' one made the applets reappear.
Comment 1 Christophe Marin 2008-07-10 15:19:54 UTC 
Created attachment 26012 [details]
plasma-appletsrc

plasma-appletsrc
Comment 2 Marco Martin 2008-07-10 15:24:18 UTC 
it seems somebody is saving that wrong transform (null matrix transform to size 0 right, i'm a bit rusty :P)
can be the applet handle?
Comment 3 Chani 2008-07-10 17:10:35 UTC 
on tuesday this happened to all my newly-added widgets for the day. I thought we had a saving bug at the time. :)
I haven't a clue what could have caused it, though... all the widgets I added on wednesday stuck around, although I think a few of them *might* have been transformed instead of deleted when I removed them...
Comment 4 Chani 2008-07-11 00:43:29 UTC 
I think commit 830604 should fix this...?
Comment 5 Aaron J. Seigo 2008-07-11 01:13:17 UTC 
yes, it does.