Bug 149076 - KMail's spam icon should be better (currently is "recycle")
Summary: KMail's spam icon should be better (currently is "recycle")
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: artwork
Classification: Miscellaneous
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: openSUSE Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: pinheiro
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-08-21 17:11 UTC by Maciej Pilichowski
Modified: 2010-06-28 01:43 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Maciej Pilichowski 2007-08-21 17:11:24 UTC
Version:            (using KDE KDE 3.5.7)
Installed from:    SuSE RPMs

Spam mail is marked with refresh icon, it is not very related to each other. Could you please rather "radioactive" icon (just an example).
Comment 1 Thomas McGuire 2007-08-22 12:23:47 UTC
Reassigning to artwork (hope that is the right thing to do).

The current spam/ham icons are indeed not that nice.
Would be cool if we get some new oxygen icons for KMail for KDE 4.
The current icons are in trunk/KDE/kdepim/kmail/pics.
Comment 2 aldebx 2009-09-13 07:20:42 UTC
I agree icons should be revamped, especially the SPAM icon.
Comment 3 Kurt Georg Hooss 2009-09-15 22:21:33 UTC
Yeah. I agree too. The spam icon could, for example,
look more like a wastepaper basket.
or, for the more drastically inclined, like a toilet.

The nospam icon is not so bad, at least it is suggestive.
However it would be cool if we could produce an idea of
how these two opposed icons would correspond more symmetrically.

Like, life and death, or, to deliver or not to deliver. You see.
Cheers, Georg


On Sunday 13 September 2009 07:20:47 aldebx@yahoo.fr wrote:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149076
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #2 from  <aldebx yahoo fr>  2009-09-13 07:20:42 ---
> I agree icons should be revamped, especially the SPAM icon.
Comment 4 pinheiro 2009-11-25 23:59:10 UTC
fixing
Comment 5 pinheiro 2010-06-28 01:43:25 UTC
fixed yesterday or the day before